Some people think the news has no connection to people s lives so it is a waste of time to read the news in the newspaper and watch television news programmes To what extent do you agree or disagree

Many people believe that it is a waste of time to read newspaper or watch television news programs which they seem to be not relevant to their lives. I totally disagree with this point of view.

On the one hand, many news which in global level are underrated by a lot of people. For them, most reports on international emergencies and events that they read are pointless just because it happened outside where they live in. For example, most people in the remote areas do not have any interest in the new policies of governments throughout the world which could improve their quality of live. Additionally, newsrooms tend to copy the content from others then post it as their news with only a different title. Therefore, their readers could fell boring and reading news seems to be purposeless because of this repetition.

However, I still believe that there is many news can be more remarkably helpful in our lives. For instance, newspaper such as Bloomberg or BBC about the finance stage could be valuable for thousands of corporates to improve their business. Information from newspaper or television news programs also plays a significant role in the increase of knowledge and experience of people. In fact, there are a large amount of knowledge that children could learned from a newspaper or watching a television news programs. Furthermore, another example that could be compelling to prove the importance of reading news is the information about the outbreak of coronavirus around the world. Thanks to this, the health of a community or a specific person could be more safety.

In conclusion, it is undeniable that news is relevant to many aspects of our lives. Therefore, I do not agree with the idea that reading news is a time-wasting activity.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 19, Rule ID: MANY_FEW_UNCOUNTABLE[2]
Message: Use 'much' or 'little' with uncountable nouns.
Suggestion: much; little
...his point of view. On the one hand, many news which in global level are underrat...
^^^^
Line 3, column 19, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun news seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much news', 'a good deal of news'.
Suggestion: much news; a good deal of news
...his point of view. On the one hand, many news which in global level are underrated by...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 41, Rule ID: MANY_FEW_UNCOUNTABLE[2]
Message: Use 'much' or 'little' with uncountable nouns.
Suggestion: much; little
... However, I still believe that there is many news can be more remarkably helpful in ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 41, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun news seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much news', 'a good deal of news'.
Suggestion: much news; a good deal of news
... However, I still believe that there is many news can be more remarkably helpful in our l...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 409, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'amounts'?
Suggestion: amounts
...e of people. In fact, there are a large amount of knowledge that children could learne...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 449, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'learn'
Suggestion: learn
...amount of knowledge that children could learned from a newspaper or watching a televisi...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, so, still, then, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1471.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96959459459 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79309769296 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527027027027 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 459.9 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.1394681551 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0666666667 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7333333333 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.86666666667 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313068803859 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112652596542 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0883505342152 0.0667982634062 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228196965952 0.151304729494 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0588914761796 0.056905535591 103% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.