Some people think that newspapers are the best way to learn about current events. However, others believe that they can learn news better through other media.
Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
The predominant way to assimilate knowledge and learn about current events is by reading newspapers and magazines that are attributed to the perspective of several individuals. Meanwhile, others reckon that social media is a prevalent tool to learn new things. My point of view inclines to the latter perspective and I will mention both opinions as well as elaborate my own view in this essay.
Several indications are preferable to get new information and events from newspapers. In fact, a significant amount of newspapers and magazines usually concentrate on several topics such as finance, economy, and social events with less distorted information written by discipline experts. Therefore, readers can easily gain deeper insights and focus on their favorite topics and events without the distraction of fake news. In reality, male senior citizens in the UK prefer to read newspapers written by professors about financial events because they can learn and assimilate constructive knowledge from them.
On the other hand, others argue that social media is a means to exploit new information. The strong development of informational technologies lead to the fast spread of events, therefore, individuals can easily access all news worldwide. Admittedly, if an individual studies economic discipline, he/she can also aggregate other news from different fields such as medicine, education, and music. Additionally, should Vietnamese students strive to get American scholarship information, for example, they can only utilize social media to get the information they want.
To sum up, a number of arguments show a preference for learning new events from newspapers, while others incline it should be social media. I strongly agree with the latter perspective because media can aggregate a plethora of information from all spheres of society, meanwhile, newspapers can only be updated part of them by expertise
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-21 | thaokim2003 | 89 | view |
| 2024-05-21 | thaokim2003 | 78 | view |
| 2021-11-29 | ashkan zaheri | 95 | view |
| 2021-11-10 | eyraen | 73 | view |
| 2021-10-27 | CDTSON | 67 | view |
- Many adults nowadays prefer spending their free time playing computer games Why do they do this Is this a positive or negative development 73
- Research indicates that we are born with have much more influence on our personality and development than any experience we have in our life which do you consider to be the major influence 78
- The advantages brought by the spread of english as a global language will continue to outweight the disadvantages Do you agree or disagree 78
- Young people are often influenced in their behaviors by others in the same age group Some argue that peer pressure is important while others feel it has distinct disadvantages Do the disadvantages of peer pressure outweigh the advantages 61
- Nowadays a growing number of people with health problems are trying alternative medicines and treatments instead of visiting their usual doctor Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 347, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...ective and I will mention both opinions as well as elaborate my own view in this essay. S...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in fact, such as, as well as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1619.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52559726962 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04642257652 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57337883959 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 513.9 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.3006918349 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.538461538 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5384615385 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.76923076923 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282671224597 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101969707257 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0509340168504 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176448723052 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0479104329151 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.09 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.