Some people think that not only should professional sports and cultural enterprises be sponsored by the government but also that amateur adult and children groups should get funding. Do you agree or disagree? Use specific reasons and examples to support your position.
In this concurrent world, it is undoubtedly true that government spend plethora of money on vocational sports and cultural events. Some people concur that rather than spending all amount of money on such activities, authority should also pay some money to adults and children who are amateur or non professionals. However, I quibble from them and propound that spending money on sports and cultural enterprises has numerous benefits for any nations. In this essay I will be cited light on both notions before a logical conclusion is reached.
Adequate evidences are obtainable to substantiate the concept of allocate money on sports and cultural events. The top-notch concrete reason is make a strong relationship with other countries because by sponsoring sport events, different nations participate in this program and it can lead to bonding friendship with other nations. Another rational reason which hauls me to patron is that sharing cultural. To uphold my notion I would like to cite an instance of players who comes from different cultures and bring our culture in their nations.
What is half full for some, may appear half empty to others. So, public in general tend to distinguish that government spend money to young adults and children who want to pursue their skill but do not have enough money to develop it which has multifurious reasons. To commence with, some people deem that if government spend some amount of money to amateur adults and juveniles; as a result, they can easily get training according to their skills and cannot face any financial problems. They also uphold that this type of financial help might lead to brighter future of adults and children as well as nation.
All in All, I reiterate that there are innumerable strong factors supporting to provide financial rid for sports and cultural enterprises. However, it's contrary can be overlooked. Consequently, I firmly disagree with this statement but authority should also think on second notion because it's base of nation development.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-03-12 | truongtuenhi | 73 | view |
| 2020-04-19 | hrbhalala | 84 | view |
- Once children start school the teachers have more influence on their intellectual and social development than parents To what extend do you agree or disagree 78
- Differences between countries become less evident each year Nowadays all over the world people share the same fashions advertising brands eating habits and TV channels Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages of this 92
- Many things that used to be done in the home by hands are now being done by machines Does this development bring more advantages or disadvantages 84
- The chart below gives the distribution of worldwide car schemes in 2008 and 2016 74
- The plans below show the layout of a university sports Centre now and how it will look after redevelopment 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 239, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'should' requires the base form of the verb: 'pay'
Suggestion: pay
... such activities, authority should also paid some money to adults and children who a...
^^^^
Line 3, column 267, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., different nations participates in this program and it can lead to bonding frien...
^^^
Line 5, column 610, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...f adults and children as well as nation also. All in All, I reiterate that there ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 169, Rule ID: OVER_LOOKED[1]
Message: Did you mean 'overlooked'?
Suggestion: overlooked
...terprises. However, its contrary can be over looked. Consequently, I firmly disagree with t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, look, may, second, so, well, in general, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1708.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17575757576 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69881448653 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578787878788 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.5925367938 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.866666667 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235503095972 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0717560452701 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0420553546874 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137447703266 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0346228506974 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.