Many believe that youngsters in modern era are exposed to a large amount of freedom. In my point of view, I partially share the same notion mentioned above.
To commence with, as we are living in a world of peace, people have more opportunities to express themselves without the fear of wars or violence. The new generation is willing to be honest and expose their inner selves to others, especially on social media where they can post anonymously and privately. For example, a number of youngsters have no reluctant revealing their sexuality and be themselves while in the past, hardly anyone would dare to. This also suggests that the society is less critical and is more open-minded about several issues range from inequality in genders and labor abusing. Therefore, young people have more space to be in the state of freedom.
On the other hand, I believe that there are still restrictions of liberty for teenagers. One justification is that parents, who are in charge of educating their children, raise their off-springs along with their own rules and discipline. Take the majority of Asian parents for instant, they have the propensity to force their child to learn special subjects at an extremely age including martial art, instruments, singing or dancing. As a result, a child's free time is limited, and they can barely do what they desire. This in long term would have an adverse impact on a person's life and career. Moreover, the content admissible on social platforms are usually restricted with the ban of inappropriate information. For children who are not matured enough to be able to distill the content they post on media, their freedom of uploading status is limited.
In conclusion, I believe that young people are free to participate in what they love to do though there are certain rules that they need to follow.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 362, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('extremely') instead an adjective, or a noun ('age') instead of another adjective.
...heir child to learn special subjects at an extremely age including martial art, instruments, sin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 572, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
... term would have an adverse impact on a persons life and career. Moreover, the content ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1536.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95483870968 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71166593702 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596774193548 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.8133427362 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.4 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.13333333333 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125630816986 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0424264392339 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0426388705543 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0744643339293 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0259056486996 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.