It is a commonly held belief that parents are responsible to teach children how to be a useful person for society. However, some assert that these social skills should be trained in school. There are rational arguments on both sides of this controversial topic which will be discussed in detail, followed by my own take on this matter.
To begin with, the most axiomatic justification is that kids' personality shapes in a family environment which is an undeniable fact. That is to say, children almost follow their parent's behavior and imitate their act. Take a father who always respects neighbors and help the elderly as an example. His kids certainly learn these attitudes from him. Simply put, parents would be children's role models and center of their attention. The biggest dream of children would be growing up fast to be like their mother or father. They always consider themselves in their parent's character.
Yet another compelling argument is that schools should train children to become proper members of a community. To put it differently, the school's responsibilities are to educate and prepare students for future life as a good and adequate person for both their personal life and society. The schools' educational programs should include social skills despite scientific subjects. Moreover, the school's training systems are more powerful and effective. A good illustration could be parents with low literacy who may show some wrong customs to their children. Schools with accurate and coherent initiatives identify these vulnerable attitudes and devising strategies to dissolve them.
To sum up, considering the points discussed above, the most rational conclusion to be drawn is that parents and schools are both crucial factors in educating social skills to children. However, I believe that the school's impacts are manifold due to its effective and regular approaches.
- Some of the methods used in advertising are unethical and unacceptable in today s society To what extent do you agree with this view 61
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- More and more people wear fashionable clothes Is this positive or negative development 84
- Nowadays celebrities earn more money than politicians What are the reasons for this Is it a positive or negative development 88
- Some people say that it is possible to tell a lot about a person s culture and character from their choice of clothes Do you agree or disagree 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, moreover, so, to begin with, to sum up, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1595.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31666666667 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77303483971 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593333333333 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.0212985693 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.6111111111 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6666666667 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232869959859 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0713308478656 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0448095547295 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151624685561 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0506650376338 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.28 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.