Some people think that people who choose a job early and keep doing it are more likely to have a satisfying career life than those who frequently change jobs. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is believed that one will be successful in their career if he finds jobs early and then be engaged in this job only. I disagree with this view because I think that people have to try some different jobs to find out which one they should be devoted to.
On the one hand, there are several reasons why attaching with only one job will not lead to a successful career. One reason is that it is not likely to get the right job in the first place. If one employee has to stick to a job which requires more than he can meet, he will have to put higher amount of effort than his colleagues to meet his tasks deadlines. This can be conducive to a huge amount of pressure he has to bear. Another plausible explanation why people just keep doing the job they find at the first time is the reluctance to change. They are afraid of new challenges they might have to face up with when trying new positions. Despite the boredom of repetitive tasks, employees feel satisfied with their current jobs because they are familiar with them and do not have to invest much time and effort on them.
On the other hand, passing several jobs may benefit people in some ways. Firstly, trying different fields of jobs will increase the chance for employees to find the most suitable jobs for their strength and passion. Finding the jobs which people are cut out for enables them to handle the works to the best of their capabilities. This will act as a catalyst for later career development. In addition, some people would go for new companies which offer them higher salaries. Therefore, they could raise living standards, which foster employees to contribute more for the companies.
In conclusion, I believe that people should experience a number of jobs before making decision of commitment to which one so as to achieve success in career.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-14 | huyen nguyen ngoc | 78 | view |
| 2023-03-31 | PHẠM THẢO | 56 | view |
| 2023-02-16 | ophongcute@gmail.com | 61 | view |
| 2022-01-05 | Blackcytrus | 73 | view |
| 2021-12-29 | Blackcytrus | 78 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 123, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...ing decision of commitment to which one so as to achieve success in career.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, may, so, then, therefore, as to, i think, in addition, in conclusion, in the first place, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1502.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.59327217125 5.12529762239 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3982048357 2.80592935109 85% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510703363914 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 458.1 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.9112947936 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.875 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4375 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202501218567 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0724918185951 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.043359125133 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127764278343 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0255124344786 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 50.2224549098 136% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.34 12.4159519038 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.38 8.58950901804 86% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.