Some people think that people who choose a job early and keep doing it are more likely to have a satisfying career life than those who frequently change jobs. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In today’s world, besides the aim of earning money, job satisfaction is one of the most essential factors determining the worker’s motivation. From my personal perspective, despite some moderate benefits of choosing a job early and maintaining it, I totally embrace the idea that job-hopping would provide people a greater sense of gratification.
On the other hand, there are several advantages to job-hopping. Apparently, switching from one job to another possibly delivers a bunch of opportunities to individuals to approach a variety of industries and thus acquire diverse skills. Hence, job hoppers may detect their genuine amusement which would give them a chance to put their knowledge gained from previous occupations into practice at the new workplace and receiving recognition for their plentiful capabilities. Consequently, a human being with a great expertized background could implicitly defeat other rivals due to their outstanding competitive edges.
However, the claim of holding an early-found job for a long time is highly exaggerated. Although individuals who stay in a long-term job would benefit from a large assemblage of job prospects, which includes work promotions and pay rises, there is still a load of possibilities which are caused by a monotonous or tough working environment. For instance, one who works under the aggressive and intolerant supervisors may sustain constantly intensive stresses which drive to a set of staff’s effortlessness. As a result, the superb solution for a human being who has work frustration is a business replacement.
To sum up, in spite of a bunch of values deriving from staying with the same durable job early such as financial incentives and higher position engagement, people who determine to pursue their own successful career by trying distinct positions are prone to achieve more marvelous profession enjoyment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-14 | huyen nguyen ngoc | 78 | view |
| 2023-03-31 | PHẠM THẢO | 56 | view |
| 2023-02-16 | ophongcute@gmail.com | 61 | view |
| 2022-01-05 | Blackcytrus | 73 | view |
| 2021-12-29 | Blackcytrus | 78 | view |
- Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end hunger and poverty while others say that economic growth is damaging the environment so it must be stopped Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Some people think advertising may have positive economic effects Other think it has social effects because individuals are not satisfied with who they are and what they have Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- The diagram below shows the changes which took place in a coastal area called Portland from 1950 to 2007 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the diagrams below 89
- The charts below show the percentage of water used by different sectors in Sydney Australia in 1997 and 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The charts illustrate the number of people who were affected by 4 types of noise pollution in day and night in cities and rural areas in 2007 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, besides, consequently, hence, however, if, may, so, still, thus, for instance, such as, as a result, in spite of, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1600.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51724137931 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22622281844 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.662068965517 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.726028198 49.4020404114 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.454545455 106.682146367 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3636363636 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.0 7.06120827912 198% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193703242036 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0705637281669 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0490203728932 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119626169124 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0405535068918 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.0946893788 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.7 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.