Some people think that people who destroy public property should be punished by community services instead of other punishments such as paying a fine and going to prison. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In current days, one may argue that deconstructing social items have to be punished by public services in lieu of applying hard punishments such as paying a fine or going to prison. Personally, I can partly agree with the opinion because of following reasons.
First of all, some people will passively commit a sin, so authorities need to apply the lowest punishments which will make them realize their mistakes without the personal effects. For example, some pestridents sometimes accidentally brake transport signals, so policies can easily solve the issues by utilizing suitable words which are enough to keep themselves from another similar mistake. Second, if authorities apply too dangerously high punishments, they will create unfamiliar faces with their citizens who decide to choose their next national leader. Generally speaking, people will prefer a national leader with friendly and suitable leading methods to an evil person who always makes everythings become more serious and critical.
However, it is true that if authorities apply light and easy punishments, people will always follow the same wrong and bad habits. For instance, deconstructing some important status in crucial destinations in a city is unacceptable activities, thus applying effective punishments such as a fine or prison is the best way to avoid people from repeating the same situations. Mentally speaking, people who are punished by money always tend to keep themselves from old mistakes. As the norm, citizens acknowledge how hard it is to make money, so they will endeavour to protect their money at all cost because that is the only way they can take care of their families.
In conclusion, I can partly agree with the opinion because intelligent authorities will realize both crime’s situations and extent because if they do without thinking, citizens will fight back for justice and equality.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-19 | minhquanvn | 74 | view |
- The diagram below shows the process for recycling plastic bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and the academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely Discuss both views and give your own o 89
- Organized tours to remote areas and communities are increasingly popular It is a positive or negative development for the local people and the environment 67
- The diagrams below show the stages and equipment used in the cement making process and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes 73
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, second, so, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, first of all, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1601.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37248322148 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83756333607 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597315436242 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.5782087768 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.545454545 106.682146367 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0909090909 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7272727273 7.06120827912 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2076964171 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0843322988559 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.081354109233 0.0667982634062 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136837749597 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0785068550458 0.056905535591 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.