Some people think that physical punishment of children is necessary, while others believe that such punishment should be made illegal.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
People have different views about the proper ways to discipline children. Some people believe that it is essential to physically punish children, while others think that such a practice should be outlawed. This essay will discuss both of these views.
On the one hand, using physical punishment on children might have several benefits. In my country, for example, almost all disruptive children are sometimes unwilling to listen to their parents who are less likely to have parenting skills; therefore, smacking children could be the quickest and most effective way to make them more obedient. Besides, the young can learn valuable lessons and avoid making mistakes, which will help them to gain the deeper understanding of the difference between right or wrong behaviors in later life.
On the other hand, corporal punishment should be banned because it has many negative impacts on children’s behavior and health, even family bond. Firstly, children who are subject to some form of violent punishment at home are likely to misbehave, and to engage in delinquent, criminal or antisocial behavior. Worse, sometimes they might be at high risk of having depression or low-self-esteem due to parents’ hard spanking on a regular basis. Secondly, children, if being smacked by their parents, will be less likely to have a good relationship with them because children may not feel parental love and care but also experience emotional and physical abuse and neglect.
In conclusion, although the importance of physical punishment in controlling children’s behaviors and attitudes is undeniable, from my perspective, in the long term, such punishment will put children at unnecessary risk of mental illness and poor health.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-08 | amandeep12345 | 82 | view |
- Both government and individuals are spending too much money protecting animals and their habitat. This money should be better 78
- Both government and individuals are spending too much money protecting animals and their habitat. This money should be better spent dealing with fundamental issues in society such as poverty and health care. To what extent do you agree? 67
- Both government and individuals are spending too much money protecting animals and their habitat. This money should be better spent dealing with fundamental issues in society such as poverty and health care. To what extent do you agree? 73
- Both government and individuals are spending too much money protecting animals and their habitat. This money should be better spent dealing with fundamental issues in society such as poverty and health care. To what extent do you agree? 73
- In countries where there is a high rate of unemployment, most pupils should be offered only primary education. There is no point in offering secondary education to those who have no hope of finding a job. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1471.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42804428044 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9463460048 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.653136531365 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.3757287208 49.4020404114 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.727272727 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6363636364 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.8181818182 7.06120827912 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32271496877 0.244688304435 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138750022483 0.084324248473 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.136625050782 0.0667982634062 205% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.229526456066 0.151304729494 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.144520904284 0.056905535591 254% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.