Some people think that products should be made to last as long as possible, while others think making the products cheap is more important.
Discuss both views and express your own opinion.
With the descending economy, a controversial issue today relates to whether to have more durable products or make them cheaper. I think products with long duration have positive consequences for the earth.
Many consumers would focus on the price the most and always choose cheaper products. they actually know that they can’t get the same performance from products at a lower price and don’t mind the duration. It’s an economical way to make ends meet as the cost-of-living crisis bites. Besides, high-priced products usually have exquisite packaging and systematic marketing campaigns. they don’t want to pay for the external stuff, which is not directly about the product itself.
There are perfectly legitimate reasons for purchasing cheap products, but it is easy to see the pitfalls. From an environmental perspective, in the production process, the factory of cheap products tends to choose the most accessible material, which may cause all kinds of pollution. Repeated purchases caused by short-duration products will consume the same budget as well as put pressure on waste disposal. choosing sustainable products not only be friendly to the environment but can also has a better user experience. For instance, high-quality trash bags can hold more trash without worrying about their load-bearing capacity.
In my opinion, people should try their economic best to buy long-lasting and environmentally friendly products. In the short run, paying less may save money and get you a similar product. However, in the long run, people would spend more on fixing or buying a new one, which may cause pollution.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-01 | cge111 | 78 | view |
| 2021-02-21 | rajpatel90 | 92 | view |
- The maps below show an industrial area in the town of Norbiton and planned future development of the site Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- It is important for people to take risks both in their professional lives and their personal lives Do you think the advantages of taking risks outweigh the disadvantages 78
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The maps below show an industrial area in the town of Norbiton and planned future development of the site Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where rele
- It is important for people to take risks both in their professional lives and their personal lives Do you think the advantages of taking risks outweigh the disadvantages 56
- Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones Why is this the case Do you think this is a positive or negative development 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 86, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...ost and always choose cheaper products. they actually know that they can’t get the s...
^^^^
Line 3, column 382, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...ing and systematic marketing campaigns. they don’t want to pay for the external stuf...
^^^^
Line 5, column 410, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Choosing
...well as put pressure on waste disposal. choosing sustainable products not only be friend...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 493, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'have'
Suggestion: have
...riendly to the environment but can also has a better user experience. For instance,...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, besides, but, however, may, so, well, for instance, i think, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1375.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39215686275 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93433452558 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.666666666667 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 408.6 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.0196367324 49.4020404114 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.6666666667 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225448241043 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0710178341361 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0459730842215 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136008014932 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0374391424109 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.