Some people think that robots are very important to human s future development Others think that they are dangerous and have negative effects on society Discuss both opinions and give your personal view

In this contemporary, human life is pampered in the laps of technology. There is a conflicting view among people that robots would play an imperative role in the future development of mankind. while others assert that automatic machines have detrimental impacts on society. This essay will examine both viewpoints and explain why I believe that robots would be the greatest helping hand to humans in future in various aspects.

To break the ice, robots are capable of performing unachievable tasks, which are not performed by humans. robotic machines can work in an unsuitable environment such as space and sea exploration. taking a real-life example into consideration, in 2018 NASA sent a robot named a rover to mars for scientific research, as that robot grabbed a lot of hidden information about mars in order to the setup of human colonies development. Moreover, robots can work under the deep sea in the search of mysterious things as well as natural resources, though humans can also explore the sea they can not stay underwater as robots can. Therefore, robots assist society do research projects in unfavourable conditions.

However, there are some detrimental effects on mankind, first and foremost, automatic machines are emotionless that can harm human lives, for instance, in the year 2007 United states had developed and enforced in an industry somehow a worker came near that automatic machine that hit on a heavy object on his due that that person got dead. More interestingly robotic machines the real labours are being replaced by these robotic machines which are leading to unemployment, for example, in Japan several restaurants are using them for cooking and cleaning.

To conclude, robots have some negative effects, these machines assist humans to increase productivity for scientific research.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 194, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...e in the future development of mankind. while others assert that automatic machines h...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 194, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “while” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e in the future development of mankind. while others assert that automatic machines h...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 428, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to humans in future in various aspects. To break the ice, robots are capable of ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 107, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Robotic
...sks, which are not performed by humans. robotic machines can work in an unsuitable envi...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 197, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Taking
...ment such as space and sea exploration. taking a real-life example into consideration,...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 251, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...life example into consideration, in 2018 NASA sent a robot named a rover to mars ...
^^
Line 3, column 410, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'colonies'' or 'coloni's', 'colony's'?
Suggestion: colonies'; coloni's; colony's
...out mars in order to the setup of human colonies development. Moreover, robots can work ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 153, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...that can harm human lives, for instance, in the year 2007 United states had devel...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, such as, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1537.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87174310173 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61724137931 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 77.6052600594 49.4020404114 157% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.083333333 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1666666667 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.16666666667 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200079444017 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0744298628633 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0412367205538 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128643516239 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0412351031765 0.056905535591 72% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.73 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.