While it is believed by some that universities should recognize students those who pass with flying colours, others consider it is crucial to felicitate students who improved their grades. This essay will discuss both why toppers should be rewarded and what impact the similar reward can bring for other students and provide its opinion.
To begin with, many consider, it is indivisible to credit efforts of students who show improvement in their academic results. This is because, if today they can show betterment in their grades with self-motivation, tomorrow with this external appreciation they may work even harder to secure highest grades. This type of rewarding system will not only boost confidence of other low scoring students but will also give more number of bright students for an university. For instance, when Oxford university conducted a similar exercise, they have seen gross increase in first class category students. Thus, if students get recognized for their small achievements, they may dream of bigger successes.
On the other hand, I think, it is natural to get rewarded for outstanding performance. As a tradition, the students those who perform extremely well in academics, receive a gold medal from university for their work and become an important alumnus of that particular batch. If universities start recognizing efforts of students who tried to improve their grades over who topped the exams, bright students will be demoralized and may stop working towards highest grades. This would be detrimental for society to find true talent. Therefore, toppers must be rewarded for their achievements.
In conclusion, although students showing betterment in their grades ought to be rewarded,
I think it is more vital to identify true talent who achieved best grades.
- In many cities today, most people live in large apartment blocks. Does this kind of accommodation have more advantages or disadvantages? 78
- Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish.Why do you think this is happening?What can governments do to help reduce the amount of rubbish produced. 78
- Some people believe that children should not be given homework every day, while others believe that they must get homework every day in order to be successful at school. 84
- Some people prefer to plan activities for their free time very carefully.Others disagree. Discuss both views, and give you opinion. 73
- Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information, such as their hobbies and interests, and whether they are married or single. Some people say that this information may be relevant and useful, others disagree. Discuss both the vie 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 454, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...give more number of bright students for an university. For instance, when Oxford u...
^^
Line 5, column 446, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'towards the highest'.
Suggestion: towards the highest
...ill be demoralized and may stop working towards highest grades. This would be detrimental for s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 76, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y true talent who achieved best grades.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance, i think, in conclusion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1522.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37809187279 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80946061741 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597173144876 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.6020544535 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.076923077 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7692307692 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0769230769 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.331751353165 0.244688304435 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12305210015 0.084324248473 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0875194665556 0.0667982634062 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196536501279 0.151304729494 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0831770932106 0.056905535591 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.