Some people think that schools should invest more money in technology, such as more computers, while others think more money should be spent on teachers. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
With the accelerating globalization and urbanization, more problems are brought to our attention. It is acknowledged that school’s technology should be invested in a particular way while others say that teacher should be more worthy contributed. This essay will give discussion about those two arguments and shed light on my points of views.
From my perspective, enhancement in technology will widen the accessibility of students to the up-to-date knowledge about every day lives. This means that children will have a chance to keep up with not only the lectures they have been taught at school, but also the news and the special situations happened in their daily lives. For instance, soft-skill (including communication skill, problem-solving skill, etc) learning through social websites on computers such as Youtube, was completely undefined at their school because of timetable limitations. If youngsters are able to acquire those skills together with things they have learned at school, they will independently find their solutions on their own.
Granted, eachers are particularly fundamental in maintaining and giving the conventional knowledge to students. This is because teachers have their special responsibility in education that technology does not have. For example, conducting a survey about giving the same class and lesson taught by a real-teacher and an artificial-teacher, there will completely result in the conclusion that children learn effectively in a real-teacher’s lesson. The more investment schools put into the teachers, the better profits we will receive in the future.
In conclusion, we should not diffrenciate about whether we should invest in either teachers or computers. Instead, it is convincing that more contributions should be invested in both teachers and computers because they will create better generations who can fulfill our requirements on both education and life experiences.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-03 | Sang Sang Sang | 78 | view |
| 2024-05-03 | Sang Sang Sang | 61 | view |
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make Has this become a positive or negative development 78
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems To what extent do you agree or disagree What other measures do you think might be effective 73
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time doing housework and households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons wher 73
- The use of mobile phones is as antisocial as smoking Smoking is banned in certain places so mobile phones should be banned like smoking To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems To what extent do you agree or disagree What other measures do you think might be effective 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1640.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.67474048443 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30533694678 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60553633218 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.4671010151 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.153846154 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2307692308 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.76923076923 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252807072399 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0953149770538 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100552285617 0.0667982634062 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185135960156 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106564330306 0.056905535591 187% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.