Some people think that schools should select students according to their academic abilities, while others believe that it is better to have students with different abilities studying together.
Discuss both views and state your own opinion.
Some people feel that schools should only admit students with certain academic abilities, whilst others think that it is more beneficial to have students with different strengths in a class. I'm personally in support of the latter because I believe that a heterogeneous group of students would be of great benefit to each student.
To begin with, people who support the idea that schools should only choose students based on their academic abilities might think that students with poor academic abilities would not able to understand class materials. And this leads to various problems. First, they would fall behind the other students in the class and be distracted. Therefore, they are likely to get involved in harmful activities. As an example, it is common to see these students today addicted to playing games because they feel that this is the only thing that makes them feel valued. Second, students who do not perform well at school often suffer emotionally. The reason is that they are constantly criticized and embarrassed by their friends and teachers.
Others, however, think that it is better to have students with different abilities. This might be because a heterogeneous group of students will create a cooperative environment. For example, when working on a project, such a class can distribute individual tasks to members with the best skills, resulting in an optimal outcome. This helps to form an environment where students can exchange their knowledge and realize their potential, which lays the foundation for them when they go to work in the future. In fact, at work, people nowadays encourage employees to work cooperatively as it can produce more positive results than to work separately.
In conclusion, while some believe schools should only select students with the ability to perform well academically, others think educators should choose a class of students with different talents. I am in favor of the latter because I think that such a class would allow students to employ their skills and incentivize them to work collaboratively with each other.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-08 | vuongthaolinh | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-01 | linhlinh123 | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-20 | thaonguyendeptraihetcuu | 78 | view |
| 2023-03-01 | minhhuy1000 | 67 | view |
| 2023-02-28 | hi.nguyn91 | 84 | view |
- The graph below shows population figures for India and China since the year 2000 and predicted population growth up until 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The Internet will never replace traditional course books in schools How far do you agree with this prediction 56
- The best curriculum is not one based on a static body of knowledge but one which teaches students to cope with change To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Young people who commit serious crimes such as robbery or violent attacks should be punished in the same way as adults To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- It is important for people to take risks both in their professional lives and their personal lives Do you think the advantages of taking risks outweigh the disadvantages 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 192, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
...ts with different strengths in a class. Im personally in support of the latter bec...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, well, while, for example, i think, in conclusion, in fact, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1757.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21364985163 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75653760913 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507418397626 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 523.8 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.4152589901 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.8125 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0625 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.375007868318 0.244688304435 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128246203159 0.084324248473 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.132781719745 0.0667982634062 199% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.269152300692 0.151304729494 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0908960951159 0.056905535591 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.