Some people think that schools should select students according to their academic abilities, while others believe that it is better to have students with different abilities studying together. Discuss both views and state your own opinion.
In the salad days of the millennium, the society is polarised into two groups almost equally. Regarding the notion that, whether schools should enrol students as per their academic abilities, while others are against it. However, different people have their distinct mindset. In my opinion, academic institutions should student of various skills and ability. Thus, everyone can experience each others part. The following paragraphs would shed light on both the approaches before making a final note.
To commence with the first notion, there are myriad things to share in its favour. Burden and pressure of different subjects will be reduced, correspondingly it will enable students to acquire knowledge without any anxiety, or any ramification. For instance, It has been found in many surveys that students who are pursuing their talent, they are more successful than others. Moreover, every individual has different abilities to perceive and cope with any problem, thereby it is paramount to pay heed on students as per their academic abilities which in turn will facilitate myriad positive things for school as well as for students.
Shifting towards the second school of thought, Classification of students may create a negative atmosphere in schools, which is again erroneous for the growth of students, as it may bring feelings of discrimination, but if all students are coming together, then they can learn many valuable things which are essential to be successful such as they can mingle with students of various thoughts, mindset, skills, religions and so on, which students can never acquire from any book. In addition, In this sensible world, it will help students to foster harmony and fraternity thereby beneficial again for their future. Furthermore, various skills from students can create a fruitful fusion in school, which directly or indirectly disseminates positive ideas.
In conclusion, I opine that skills assist students to elevate themselves in every point of life, and it can be possible with an effective collaboration of many abilities. Here, I support the latter one.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-08 | vuongthaolinh | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-01 | linhlinh123 | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-20 | thaonguyendeptraihetcuu | 78 | view |
| 2023-03-01 | minhhuy1000 | 67 | view |
| 2023-02-28 | hi.nguyn91 | 84 | view |
- It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct e g dinosaurs dodos There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening Do you agree or disagree 84
- Topic The first graph shows the number of train passengers from 2000 to 2009 The second graph shows the percentage of trains running on time Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- Topic In some countries schools are teaching foreign languages for primary school children Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 73
- In many countries today if people want to find a job they have to move away from their friends and their families Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 89
- The graph shows the value in US dollars in millions of dollars of investment in funds of four categories from 1988 to 2014 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, regarding, second, so, then, thus, well, while, as for, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1776.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39817629179 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81007601213 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601823708207 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 540.0 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 106.34965392 49.4020404114 215% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 118.4 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9333333333 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.3333333333 7.06120827912 175% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267287423034 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0857408357318 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0678937990441 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154298224118 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0711540766626 0.056905535591 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.