The best way to solve the world’s environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel. Do you agree or disagree with this view?
Following the thriving and innovation in many aspects of society, leads to arise several problems, and one of the most urgent issues, which draw much attention is environmental issues. There are those who opine that the most optimal solution for global environmental problems is to raise the price of fuel. From my perspective, I maintain that a global awareness campaign is the most feasible option.
On the one hand, rising the price of fuel means increases in transportation costs for businesses. As a result, the price of products will also be increased remarkably in order to expense all of these costs. This solution may have indirectly an unexpected effect on the quality of life of people who just have lower-income. This is often the case for Vietnamese who have a tendency to purchase imported merchandise so that they will be given more chances to purchase much nutritious food that may not be available in Vietnam’s market. However, because of rising imported taxes, this food such as American beef has been pretty expensive to far-reaching for lots of people. Moreover, transportation expenses have a great influence on people’s lives, especially those having low incomes. Therefore, raising the price of fuel can make it difficult for them in making ends meet which can result in a higher poverty rate.
On the other hand, there are several extraordinary benefits that we need to consider thoroughly. The first advantage is that today most vehicles are running on fossil fuel, making this fuel becoming the most prevalent energy hard to replace. Therefore, if the government introduces higher taxes on using non-renewable sources, citizens may tend to choose eco-friendly energy as an alternative. Besides, this approach makes the community cut down on using private vehicles with the aim to balance the expenses. In this way, it will bring more advantages in contributing to confining pollution to the environment, especially greenhouse gas, which is one of the primary causes driving the global warming phenomenon. Another reason is that there are lots of companies relying on petrol fuel, for example, to operate the machine systems. Hence, in this aspect, increasing the cost of finite resources will create the motivation for them to convert to consuming natural resources such as solar energy and wind energy.
In conclusion, while increasing fuel costs can partly solve the environmental problems by discouraging private vehicle usage, the ideal solution would be making the public and enterprises aware of these issues. I am also convinced that once more resolute actions are taken, humans can reverse the effect of climate change and environmental problems.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-14 | Sang Sang Sang | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-13 | Sang Sang Sang | 78 | view |
| 2022-09-30 | tieuquynh | 78 | view |
| 2022-09-30 | tieuquynh | 78 | view |
| 2022-04-21 | Yamin_j | 61 | view |
- Some people think that some individuals are naturally good leaders while others think individuals can learn leadership skills Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
- The plan below shows the village of Pebbleton 20 years ago and now 11
- The diagrams show how glass containers such as bottles are produced and recycled 78
- The graph shows the value in US dollars in millions of dollars of investment in funds of four categories from 1988 to 2014 73
- Topic Some people think scientific research should focus on solving world health problems Others think that there are more important issues Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, hence, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2265.0 1615.20841683 140% => OK
No of words: 429.0 315.596192385 136% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27972027972 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55107846309 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88748250535 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 242.0 176.041082164 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564102564103 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 726.3 506.74238477 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.9130072915 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.210526316 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5789473684 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.94736842105 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18356712136 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0535129800932 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0495042274697 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113597027825 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0378352269019 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 129.0 78.4519038076 164% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, hence, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2265.0 1615.20841683 140% => OK
No of words: 429.0 315.596192385 136% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27972027972 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55107846309 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88748250535 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 242.0 176.041082164 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564102564103 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 726.3 506.74238477 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.9130072915 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.210526316 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5789473684 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.94736842105 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18356712136 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0535129800932 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0495042274697 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113597027825 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0378352269019 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 129.0 78.4519038076 164% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.