Some people think that schools should select students according to their academic abilities,
while others believe that it is better to have students with different abilities studying together.
Discuss both views and state your own opinion.
Education has always been a controversial issue in society, especially for parents. While some people think that schools should select students according to their academic abilities, the others believe that having students with different abilities studying together instead is better. In my opinion, getting students to excel in each subject together helps them thrive in another field. However, it is better to have students with different abilities studying together. This essay will discuss both the views and will tell the reason why.
First of all, the selection for students with their abilities will help them to develope their skills and and increase competition among students. This is not only like a movation for them to study better but also can improve their knowledge in that field without any problems. Moreover, most of curriculums may be their academy interest. As an evidence, many reseachers have said that focusing on an academic abilities will help us develop that skill comprehensively and engage in research that helps develop the economy, science, etc. For this reason, the importance of academic abilities should not be denied.
On the other hand, some peole tend to let their kids study with different abilities. It will help them to be improved in every field by their friends who good on a certain field and in contrast, they will help their friend in his or her academic skills, which is not only beneficial but also necessary. For instance, the recently report said that students at school can improve their skills comprehensively not only by their teacher but also because of the helping of their friends at school. Therefore, the importance of studying together can not be ignored.
After analysing the discussion, it can be concluded that the role of studying together is significant, but it can not improve and develope students skills like selecting students according to their academic abilities
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-08 | vuongthaolinh | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-01 | linhlinh123 | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-20 | thaonguyendeptraihetcuu | 78 | view |
| 2023-03-01 | minhhuy1000 | 67 | view |
| 2023-02-28 | hi.nguyn91 | 84 | view |
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 103, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: and
...will help them to develope their skills and and increase competition among students. Th...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 288, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the curriculums') or simply say ''most curriculums''.
Suggestion: most of the curriculums; most curriculums
...t field without any problems. Moreover, most of curriculums may be their academy interest. As an ev...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 410, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'ability'?
Suggestion: ability
... have said that focusing on an academic abilities will help us develop that skill compreh...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, while, for instance, in contrast, first of all, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1626.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22829581994 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67189609693 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508038585209 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.5033332384 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.4 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7333333333 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.4 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.438895376854 0.244688304435 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.166010552203 0.084324248473 197% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.177953573859 0.0667982634062 266% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.307412165781 0.151304729494 203% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.172891001 0.056905535591 304% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 103, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: and
...will help them to develope their skills and and increase competition among students. Th...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 288, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the curriculums') or simply say ''most curriculums''.
Suggestion: most of the curriculums; most curriculums
...t field without any problems. Moreover, most of curriculums may be their academy interest. As an ev...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 410, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'ability'?
Suggestion: ability
... have said that focusing on an academic abilities will help us develop that skill compreh...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, while, for instance, in contrast, first of all, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1626.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22829581994 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67189609693 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508038585209 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.5033332384 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.4 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7333333333 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.4 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.438895376854 0.244688304435 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.166010552203 0.084324248473 197% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.177953573859 0.0667982634062 266% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.307412165781 0.151304729494 203% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.172891001 0.056905535591 304% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.