Some people think that success should be measured by the material possessions a person has acquired while others think it should be judged by the knowledge he or she has.
There lives diversified opinions about what could be determinants of success. One conspicuous view of which is that success should be assimilated to the accomplishment of tangible properties whereas others believe rather how much knowledge a person has acquired to be the factor. This essay will delve deeper to both of these views, and state my opinion that neither these factors alone would live up to such a role.
In a materialistic society we are living today, money is the key to achieve from basic necessities to luxurious passions, whose reflection is usually through the possession of tangible assets, thus making a person with opulence very likely to be regarded as successful. However, this view is flawed by dints of not taking into account other criteria such as family life or contribution to society. Take into example the case of Trung Nguyen Group, whose founder conflicted with his wife and putting his family in split or the affluent people controlling drug business, gaining most of their financial status through illegal means. In addition, not all progression through out a person's life, such as academic achievement, mental would evaluate to cash. Accordingly, using money as the sole indicator would remain insufficient for assessing success.
Analogously, unaccompanied knowledge is inadequate as a measurement criterion of success. People who believe otherwise may stoke up a forgone conclusion that individuals with an ample amount of knowledge have the ability to make sensible decisions throughout their life, thus making them achievers. However, this idea suffers from grave misapprehension of the relationship between knowledge and wisdom. The former bears no direct correlation to the latter, which means that any adult with an abundance of knowledge attained, such as in-depth facts, details, information of a situation or multiple topics, is not necessarily able to make sound decisions, but to be precise, it is the utilization of such knowledge enables one to and is what truly defines success. So often depicted in a multitude of TV shows such as "Way to Olympia peak" are individuals who demonstrated vast intellectual understanding across segments of life, but setting aside such knowledge-niched talent, not much of them have been heard of great contributions to society.
In conclusion, although either knowledge and materialistic affluence may be a necessity to succeed, but singularly insufficient to guarantee so. In my opinion, wisdom where one is able to make thorough decisions with regards to ethnicity, laws and one's wishes is what would define one's success.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-04 | hungdung2507 | 79 | view |
| 2022-07-04 | hungdung2507 | 89 | view |
- Technology can be a threat to the survival of a language but it can also serve as a powerful tool to preserve even restore languages Discuss the statement and give your opinion 78
- The chart below shows the value of one country’s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015. 67
- Successful sports professionals can earn a great deal more money than people in other important professions Some people think this is fully justified while others think it is unfair Discuss both these views and give your opinion 84
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much. 73
- It is said that countries should produce all food for their population to eat and import as little as possible. Do you agree or disagree? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 262, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...how much knowledge a person has acquired to be the factor. This essay will delve ...
^^
Line 2, column 82, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
...today, money is the key to achieve from basic necessities to luxurious passions, whose reflection...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 664, Rule ID: THROUGH_OUT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'throughout'?
Suggestion: throughout
...means. In addition, not all progression through out a persons life, such as academic achiev...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 678, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...tion, not all progression through out a persons life, such as academic achievement, men...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 248, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ons with regards to ethnicity, laws and ones wishes is what would define ones succes...
^^^^
Line 4, column 281, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ws and ones wishes is what would define ones success.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, however, if, may, so, thus, whereas, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 41.998997996 155% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2211.0 1615.20841683 137% => OK
No of words: 410.0 315.596192385 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39268292683 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07801109327 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 246.0 176.041082164 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 700.2 506.74238477 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 80.7909235826 49.4020404114 164% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.4 106.682146367 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3333333333 20.7667163134 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187354749851 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0657394552502 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.070256448335 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114412480578 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0565286312061 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.83 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 78.4519038076 161% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.