It is true that students ought to learn a range of subjects for every semester in school to acquire knowledge and improve their career prospect. Although I agree with this statement, I believe paying closer attention to the subject that teenagers interested or show talent will bring them more benefit in the future.
Admittedly, the school curriculum is tailored to impart basic knowledge about human culture and our world, which is of significance for learners' overall development. For example, biology involves basic knowledge of our body, geography offers skills of reading maps, and mathematics relates to calculating numbers. However, emphasising all the subjects may create undue pressure on teenagers, and some pupils are forced to toil away what they show no interest, ending up in weariness in the study.
On the other hand, by converging all their attention on a handful of subjects, one has ample time to improve and work on the mistake because of the elimination of other subjects. This allows students to gain proficiency earlier in their fields, which will ultimately open the door to better employment prospect. For example, most successful celebrity or sports stars only focused on their talented area in the teen years and spent their time practising or doing regular training to improve their professional performance. Also, learning the subject that best suits the learners' characteristics can motivate their levels to staggering heights which can ultimately affect their results positively. In contrast, equal attention usually means mediocre.
In conclusion, I do not deny that studying all the required subjects offers a valuable option for some pupils. However, giving priority to specific subjects that young generation show interest or talent bring them a brighter future.
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- Air travel can only benefit the richest people in the world Ordinary people can get no advantage with the development of air travel To what extent do you agree or disagree 52
- Nowadays cultures of different countries are becoming more similar than they used to be.What are the reason? Is it a positive or a negative development? Give your own opinion and examples. 89
- The graph shows the demand for energy and the energy available for fossil fuels in Freedonia from 1985 to 2005 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 93
- Some people think that teenagers should concentrate on all subjects at school. Others believe that teenagers should focus on the subjects they are best at or they are most interested in. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, so, for example, in conclusion, in contrast, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1529.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44128113879 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79102495349 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622775800712 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.661764403 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.416666667 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4166666667 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.16666666667 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163740890145 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0560073908159 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0462057514479 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104562774338 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0329891612734 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.