Some people think that teenagers should follow what the old people say whereas some believe that it is good for teenage people to challenge what old people say.
Discuss both opinions and give your opinion.
There are two viewpoints about advising teenager with the older people. Some people claim that, adolescents should accept every thing that alder people say. While, others believe that youth should discuss with them and do not accept easily. Nonetheless, personally, I believe that this issue depend completely to the kind of subject older people say.
The people that think, teenager should admit older people talk, express different reasons for it. The first reason is that, elder people hav high experience in life. For this reason, they can better analyses issues especially the subject related to the life. For instance, in choosing expose that will have a serious impact in future youth life, parents can assist to the children a lot. The research show that, in majority of time when teenagers do not listen to the older advices in this field, they became harmed. Another example is the.
On the other hand, opponent of above idea have another view, and believe teenager should not accept any thing older says. Nowadays, adolescents can be have access to every information that need through different ways such as, internet and social media. Likewise, work with some of these gadgets are hard for elderly therefore, they may be do not have enough information about up-to- date subject. For instance, about the investing at bourse because, they do not have adequate information about it thus, advices children for avoiding of invest in this field. For this reason, children should talk with them and challenge about it.
In conclusion, although both views are correct about accept or reject older people say by adolescents, I believe that the type of subject is very important on teenager reaction. Select expose and investing in bourse are sample of these issues.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-05 | mohamadi654094 | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-05 | mohamadi654094 | 73 | view |
- Many criminals commit crimes after they were set free. Research indicates that the people who were convicted criminals would often commit crimes when they are set free. cauase and solve this issue? 67
- alternative sources are more beneficial than fossil fuels.to what extend agree or disagree? 84
- The graph gives information about drinking habits of the US population by age. 73
- alternative resources like wind are more benefit than Fossil fuels.agree or disagree? 78
- Fossil fuels (e.g. coals, oil and gas) are the main source of energy for most countries. However, alternative sources of energy (e.g. wind and solar) have been encouraged to be used by some countries.To what extent is this a positive or negative developme 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 286, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to expose'
Suggestion: to expose
... to the life. For instance, in choosing expose that will have a serious impact in futu...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 537, Rule ID: THE_SENT_END[1]
Message: Did you forget something after 'the'?
... they became harmed. Another example is the. On the other hand, opponent of ab...
^^^^
Line 9, column 101, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[2]
Message: Did you mean 'anything'?
Suggestion: anything
... and believe teenager should not accept any thing older says. Nowadays, adolescents can b...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, likewise, may, nonetheless, so, therefore, thus, while, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1497.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16206896552 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.345699635 2.80592935109 84% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548275862069 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.1712585946 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.0588235294 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0588235294 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.70588235294 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254586395686 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0896123882217 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0988116491426 0.0667982634062 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178853921031 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0783972771653 0.056905535591 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.