Some people think that too much money has been spent looking after and repairing old buildings, so we should knock down old buildings and build modern ones instead. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is thought that the government has spent too much revenue for paying attention and repairing traditional buildings, so they should knock down old buildings and establish new ones instead. From my point of view, in some situation i mostly argee with this notion because of its benefits and practical for the resident life. The following essay will analyse this statement in detail.
First of all, in the industrialized world and with the appearence of modern technology that the requirement of people have increase gradually, so modern buildings is greatly significant for the development of their country. Not only does this phenomenon provide numeous social experience, modern innovation and facilities for the adolesence which improve their mentality life and cognitive systerm, but also the propotion of unemployment and homeless people can be reduced which more occupation and opportunity will be created such as professional disigner. Furthermore, the creative and imagination abilities of postgraduates will be advanced which lead strengh affection for the economic background. To illustrate, there was a survey by Kevin Rice, the famous interviewer, and professor, who is expert about the success of european countries where their government focus to develop the modern value. The statistic demonstrated that nearly every countries has got plenty of achievement.
However, we can not negate the drawback of this problem for the society. If the government are just concentrate to build modern apartment, they will forget the historic and cutural value and also the socioeconomic trouble can widened dramatically where only wealthy and talent individuals have enough abilities to appoarch with the modern one. Moreover, many government take advantage from this investment for their own profits, various harmful influence will be led by this action to the young generation.
To conclude, though my agrument from the essay, i totally agree with this statement, but it still have some negative aspects for the society. The state need to have clear plans to improve their citizens for the nation's development.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-17 | nunu | 78 | view |
| 2023-09-29 | tieuquynh | 89 | view |
| 2023-09-15 | hien3112 | 61 | view |
| 2023-09-07 | Vishva2412 | 56 | view |
| 2023-09-07 | Vishva2412 | 56 | view |
- Some people think that instead of preventing climate change we need to find a way to live with it To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The government should be responsible for providing retirees with financial support and care While many people think that citizens should save money to take care of themselves when they are old Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Rich countries should allow jobs for skilled and knowledgeable employees who are from poor countries Do you agree or disagree 78
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid Do you agree or disagree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ill analyse this statement in detail. First of all, in the industrialized worl...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ntries has got plenty of achievement. However, we can not negate the drawback ...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... this action to the young generation. To conclude, though my agrument from the...
^^
Line 4, column 101, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'has'?
Suggestion: has
...agree with this statement, but it still have some negative aspects for the society. ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 214, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...plans to improve their citizens for the nations development.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, still, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 26.0 8.3376753507 312% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1791.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49386503067 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92613759588 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61963190184 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 553.5 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 77.7526041726 49.4020404114 157% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.769230769 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0769230769 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61538461538 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161411908231 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0558101002855 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0956365122687 0.0667982634062 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103330237917 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0780223665689 0.056905535591 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.06 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.