Some people think that we should invent a new language for international communication. Do the benefits of this outweigh the problems?
It is argued that due to the dramatic increase in cultural exchange and international business trade, a global language should be created. While there are some good arguments in favor of not being necessary to have an international language, I strongly believe that it is more likely to bring some potential benefits.
First, it is obvious that if one language is dominant, others may vanish. There is no denying fact that English is being widely used as a global second language. For example, international business meetings are regularly held in English. By the same token, almost the most vital textbooks and journals are published in English. Therefore, the ability to speak English is a necessary skill for people from all walks of life to find high salary jobs. This can lead to reduce the variety of language, because of neglect on the value of studying first language.
Furthermore, American culture has become popular around the world, since a dominant language could bring its own culture. It definitely can make other cultural background and identities be damaged. For instance, the significant number of Vietnamese people has been chosen junk food for their meals instead of traditional food in recent years. From the equity theory perspective, as an alternative to English, a new international language which has no nationality or culture attached to it can demonstrate that there is no preference for any countries. For these reasons, in spite of the dramatic growth in globalization, an international language can help to promote international peace and understanding, and ensure to preserve cultural diversity. Esperanto is an example of a language that was invented with this aim.
In conclusion, it seems to me that the invention of second global language can demand the international communication without an adverse impact on any countries.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 273, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to junk'
Suggestion: to junk
...er of Vietnamese people has been chosen junk food for their meals instead of traditi...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, may, second, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in spite of, by the same token
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1574.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28187919463 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02980554395 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587248322148 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9412455942 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.933333333 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8666666667 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.73333333333 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225950639007 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0705157946739 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0466107964208 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130201092889 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0382414351136 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.