Some people think women should be given the same opportunity to work and excel just like men. Others believe that a woman’s responsibility should be limited to looking after children and housework. What is your opinion? Use relevant details and examples to support your choice.
Generally, some individuals think that women have the right to have the same chance to work and be outstanding as men. In contrast, others believe that a woman's major role is taking care of children and doing housework to support their husband. In my opinion, from today the women should get the same opportunity as men.
On the one hand, for the policy of the sexes equality, the government has to create some social institutions for women because they are suffering from employment of distinction. For example, in Korea many women have been constrained in their workplace because of their physical condition. When they are pregnant, companies think they are not efficient anymore and fire them, also sometimes they experience sexual objectification from her boss at the office or male employees. Moreover, there are some fields that have wage disparity between men and women, and men’s incomes are almost twice as much as women’s. Thus, we need to introduce some social systems that can relieve this problem.
On the other hand, it is wrong that women can’t work since raising children and household chores. Because of the trend of gender equality, it is a recent tendency to share the housework with other family member, and
looking after kids together. For example, nowadays we can see many families which are double-income families. In the case of it, parents can support their children more effectively by providing them with a good quality of education. Therefore, it is false that women can’t be employed because of duty for taking care of their kids and housework.
To sum up, in my perspective, based on recent public views it is clear that people who stand by traditional views will reduce.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-03 | andreahoangbp | 56 | view |
| 2023-06-03 | andreahoangbp | 56 | view |
| 2023-06-03 | andreahoangbp | 56 | view |
| 2023-06-03 | andreahoangbp | view | |
| 2021-03-26 | chlwkgus | 11 | view |
- Some people think women should be given the same opportunity to work and excel just like men Others believe that a woman s responsibility should be limited to looking after children and housework What is your opinion Use relevant details and examples to s 73
- Plastic shopping bags contribute to the pollution of land and sea Some people think they should be banned Do you agree or disagree 56
- Some people think women should be given the same opportunity to work and excel just like men Others believe that a woman s responsibility should be limited to looking after children and housework What is your opinion Use relevant details and examples to s 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 40, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sexes'' or 'sex's'?
Suggestion: sexes'; sex's
... On the one hand, for the policy of the sexes equality, the government has to create ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 216, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... housework with other family member, and looking after kids together. For example...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, moreover, so, therefore, thus, as to, for example, in contrast, in my opinion, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1438.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04561403509 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66027859051 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.585964912281 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 450.0 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.5924117874 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.714285714 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3571428571 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.78571428571 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233936402265 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.081214694517 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0713459053614 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128708210667 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111063973971 0.056905535591 195% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.