Some people think that you can never become fluent in a language unless you have spent time living or working in that country. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
One's linguistic mastery is no one-dimensional matter. While accustoming oneself t a language is widely regarded as pivotal, debates arise whether prospecting multi-linguists should go to as extreme of lengths as visiting the language's origins to achieve true fluency. In spite of its indisputable advantages, I am against the notion of resorting to such measures as a fixed prerequisite.
To begin with, statements acknowledging the merits of residing in a country on an individuals linguistic proficiency are indeed indisputable. In an environment which inhibits one to use their native language, said individuals have no choice but to exclusively utilize the language relevant in the country consistently. Many researches confirmed prolonged exercise of a skill done consistently enough leads to substantial improvement of said skill - and this includes linguistic proficiency.
However, other simpler means of acclimatization also exist. With the rapid availability of the Internet to the greater mass, being up to date to world's affairs has never been easier. Local news and entertainment medias (e.g., movies and songs) made in foreign languages have also been entertainment medias to the global audience - an opportunity countless polyglots has taken advantage of. While the utilization of such medias has varying degree of success, it is unarguably cheaper and subsequently more accessible to individuals other than the elites and elitists.
In other words, utilizing and familiarizing oneself to a language consistently via the omni-accessible Internet can serve as a cheaper and equal alternative to prolongedly residing in said language's home country. Nevertheless, dismissing either as being invalid means of improving one's fluency would be detrimentally unwise.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 80, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'an individual' or simply 'individuals'?
Suggestion: an individual; individuals
... the merits of residing in a country on an individuals linguistic proficiency are indeed indis...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 282, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...her as being invalid means of improving ones fluency would be detrimentally unwise.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, e.g., however, nevertheless, so, while, as to, in other words, in spite of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1517.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.79007633588 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.4593745321 2.80592935109 123% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648854961832 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.7611889134 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.416666667 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8333333333 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0680603336198 0.244688304435 28% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0215630511178 0.084324248473 26% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0243651647943 0.0667982634062 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0397531456835 0.151304729494 26% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00916609905911 0.056905535591 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 50.2224549098 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.3 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.46 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.