Some people thinks that printed books are no longer necsessary in this digital era as all writings can be stored electrically. Others think that printed books still play importance roles. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
People differ greatly in their views as to whether or not the traditional paper books will be still of great necessity when the enormous popularity of electronic equipment such as iphone and ipad keeps on soaring. While I agree that e-books are associated with some benefits, I contend that printed books could never be substituted because of their unique merits.
On the one hand, there are two compelling reasons accounting for the advantages of e-reading. Seen from the positive aspects, the writings stored electrically may be more attractive than traditional ones. This is because not only do e-books provide words, illustrations, pictures that traditional books have, but they also add sounds, moving images and cartoons that printed books cannot offer. Another benefit of e-books is that they can be eco-friendly. A clear explanation of this is that less paper will be needed in the production process and electronic libraries can save more space.
What I want to rebut, however, is that the immense value of printed books cannot be ignored. The primary reason is that although it is easy to acquire and utilize (get and use) e-books, it is far from for millions of people to change their deeply-rooted habits of reading paper books. More precisely, numerous people insist on (keep-continue) perusing paper books in a traditional way because they can take note in the blank of a page. In addition, unlike using e-books which is just a sort of fast-food reading, traditional reading enables people to have in-depth thinking. Readers, as a consequence, may enhance their literacy.
In conclusion, it is my view that although I concede that using electric books is advantageous in some ways such as their attraction and being eco-friendly, I am firmly convinced that traditional books will not vanish/disappear solely due to e-reading because of having many people familiarising with traditional reading method and helping readers have critical thought. I predict that due to that printed books and e-reading are not mutually exclusive, both of them will co-exist in the near future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-11-14 | truognchinh | 84 | view |
- The international community must act immediately to ensure that all nations reduce their consumption of fossil fuels a.g gas and oil. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Children’s education is expensive. In some countries, the governments pay some or all of the costs. Do the advantages outweigh its disadvantages. 73
- The best way to solve world’s environmental problems is increasing the cost of fuel. Do you agree or disagree? 56
- Nowadays, as women and men have to work full-time, household duties should be equally divided. Do you agree or disagree? 73
- The pie chart shows the amount of money that a children's charity located in the USA spent and received in one year. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 38, Rule ID: WHETHER[4]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; whether or not; as to whether
People differ greatly in their views as to whether or not the traditional paper books will be sti...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 361, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a traditional way" with adverb for "traditional"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...t on keep-continue perusing paper books in a traditional way because they can take note in the blank...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, still, while, as to, in addition, in conclusion, sort of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1756.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21068249258 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89513591013 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560830860534 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 544.5 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 76.4111128257 49.4020404114 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.428571429 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0714285714 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244057275189 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0901335977708 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0552676365174 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163279415948 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0300321259206 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.