Some people work for the same organisation all their working life. Others think that it is better to work for different organisations.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Write at least 250 words.
Organisational work culture has witnessed a paradigm shift in recent times with some people inclined towards a frequent migration between companies while other section of people believe that loyalty to one organisation outweighs the advantages of changing organisations. I would like to agree with the first section of people that is it is better to not dedicate one's own career to one organisation for an entire working lifetime.
It is generally accepted that exposure to multiple working environments fosters creative thinking, widens a person's knowledge and ability to survive and thrive in competitive conditions. Consider a fish that lives in an aquarium. When put in a larger pond or a lake, it succumbs to the adversarial conditions that exist in bigger habitats. Compared to this, schools of fishes living in larger aquatic environments adapt to survive and that lends more strength to them. However, there lies a commonly held opinion that frequent migrations imply that the person is less dependable and unprofessional. But this is unwarranted as an individual's professionalism depends on his or her competence in work and not on his history, And this competence can only be gained through a steeper learning curve that is difficult to attain by being loyal to one organisation.
On the other hand, loyalty to one company does display a sense of professionalism and dependability. This especially helps in getting promoted within an organisational hierarchy as the latter favors a person's professional reputation. Hence it is not wrong to state that working for one company for an entire career fetches better chances of rising among the ranks of institutional ladder. But people treading this path tend to lose out on many opportunities outside the boundaries of their organisation. In a more personal experience, a long career in computer networking leads to lesser chances of learning emerging cutting-edge technologies of work offered in other companies.
On a detailed examination of both pros and cons of the two types of organisational behavior, it can be concluded that working in different organisations offers vantages that outweigh organisational loyalty as the former provides wider horizons for exploring new things and enhancing one's own career. As a popular saying goes "Love your job, but not your company", it is apt in today's scenario to credit personal growth with more importance than loyalty for an organisation. In the long run, this attitude complements the growth of the organisation itself.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-21 | CharanpreetSingh | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-21 | CharanpreetSingh | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | milad69692ielts | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-14 | Subhashree22 | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-23 | Maanya 09 | 73 | view |
- In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food. To what extent do you agree or disagree wi 73
- The way a message is delivered is often more important than the message itself.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and suppo 75
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and su 50
- The bar graph shows the annual rentals and sales of VHS, DVD and Blu-ray films from a shop during 2002 and 2011 73
- The chart below gives the information about Southland s main exports in 2000 2014 and future projections for 2025 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 109, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...nts fosters creative thinking, widens a persons knowledge and ability to survive and th...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 630, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...essional. But this is unwarranted as an individuals professionalism depends on his or her c...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 789, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to curve'
Suggestion: to curve
...ly be gained through a steeper learning curve that is difficult to attain by being lo...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 200, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a person' or simply 'persons'?
Suggestion: a person; persons
...sational hierarchy as the latter favors a persons professional reputation. Hence it is no...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 235, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...vors a persons professional reputation. Hence it is not wrong to state that working f...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 609, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to emerge'.
Suggestion: to emerge
...ing leads to lesser chances of learning emerging cutting-edge technologies of work offer...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2146.0 1615.20841683 133% => OK
No of words: 400.0 315.596192385 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.365 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23462130705 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 684.9 506.74238477 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.8250276447 49.4020404114 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.125 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 7.06120827912 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2443191026 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0697377701359 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0680636292627 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156166542895 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0652743360563 0.056905535591 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.73 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 78.4519038076 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.