Some schools have restricted the use of mobile phones. Is this a positive or a negative one?
In the past, a restriction of not bringing phones in the schools is extremely necessary in order to keep students’ concentration on the lesson, however, today’s schools are not using this method anymore because most people believe that utilizing phones is a part of adaption to modern technology. Despite of this appeal, I personally believe that the rules to restrict students using their devices in campus has negative impact in terms of gaining wide range of understanding as well as obtaining tons of valuable information through the internet.
Restricting phone use in the classroom means devaluing the advantages of technology. Since teacher and library have limited access to alleviate students understanding on various materials, thanks to the internet, with its numerous algorithms, this problem can be solved properly, helping students for wider understanding through their devices. For instance, with only a single tap on the screen, learners are able to get everything their need on phones, and of course this method is more effective than wasting time reading in a pile of papers. By obeying this fact, banning phones can easily decrease the efficiency in academic progress.
Furthermore, human error in teaching will eventually provide false information in the studying process. For example, in some cases because of fatigue and unwanted passion to carry out materials, teacher can simultaneously direct students to fallacy. In my view, the classroom should provide comparisons between what teacher and teaching materials in general deliver, which some applications in students’ devices, such as google, plays an important role in this circumstance.
I strongly agree that restricting phones in schools can give negative effect on students’ academic process. It is simply because banning phones make learners incapable of increasing their thoughts and can unintentionally misdirect students to obtain valid information.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-14 | mnaufalnurrahman | 84 | view |
| 2021-10-14 | mnaufalnurrahman | 84 | view |
- The graph below gives the information about car ownership in Britain from 1971 to 2007
- The chart shows the percentage of women and men in one Asian country who passed when they took their driving test between 1980 and 2010 89
- Some schools have restricted the use of mobile phones Is this a positive or a negative one 84
- The graph below gives the information about car ownership in Britain from 1971 to 2007 89
- The graph below gives the information about car ownership in Britain from 1971 to 2007 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 476, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...an important role in this circumstance. I strongly agree that restricting phones...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, so, well, for example, for instance, in general, of course, such as, as well as, in my view, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1653.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.62244897959 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02080840947 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608843537415 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.0064276286 49.4020404114 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.272727273 106.682146367 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7272727273 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6363636364 7.06120827912 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25993619844 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100243995515 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0771908396787 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154075981539 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0692292103678 0.056905535591 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 13.0946893788 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.08 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 9.78957915832 204% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.