A scholar of thoughts from high school seniors holds that they want to have a year- long break after graduating because of various reasons like working, traveling, so on. In my opinion, the drawbacks outweigh the merits.
On the one hand, there are considerable benefits which gap year takers will be received. First of all, some students from the unprivileged family can accumulate a financial fund to cover the expensive higher education tuition from working some part-time or fulltime jobs at that time. Besides that, delaying tertiary education for one year not only make the improvement of their financial status, but also it enriches their life experiences; as a result, they can specify what the suitable job or field is theirs and pursue plans for their career path in the future.
On the other hand, there are many irresistible drawbacks about time, financial, mental problems if some people dedicated to defer university enrollment. First, gap- year takers who will be procrastinated their studying time; As a result, they will waste more studying years than their friends of same ages. Moreover, when the gap-year students realize that their friends not only are developing their prosperity day-by-day, but also their knowledge is extended more than the gap-year pupils; hence, pupils who had a year-long break can be fallen behind and they are feel more unconfident than. Secondly, people who delay tertiary education for one year will have personal income lower than who do not take a gap-year. Restrictively, high-school graduates are usually searched entry-level jobs to work so a high-level of paycheck is never got by themselves; meanwhile, their friends who do not delay university for a year will be applied for some better jobs and the jobs both help them cultivate relevant job skills and earn salary higher than.
In conclusion, I completely believe that students who procrastinate university enrollment will have the disadvantages outweigh the advantages. Stopping university program for a year not only take more time, but also have lower financial than others at the same age.
- The diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar cane Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- Some people give more importance to artists painter writers musicians in the current age of rapidly developing technology and science What do you think Do people prefer arts to technology in your view 95
- Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere To what extent do you agree with this view 73
- In the future all cars buses and trucks will be driverless The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passengers Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages 84
- some people give more importance to artists painter writers musicians in the current age of rapidly developing technology and science What do you think Do people prefer arts to technology in your view 89
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 690, Rule ID: IN_WHO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whom'?
Suggestion: whom
...ar will have personal income lower than who do not take a gap-year. Restrictively,...
^^^
Line 4, column 700, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ve personal income lower than who do not take a gap-year. Restrictively, high-sch...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, hence, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, in conclusion, as a result, first of all, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1771.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 338.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23964497041 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77034475394 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568047337278 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 546.3 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 80.4818820191 49.4020404114 163% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.583333333 106.682146367 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1666666667 20.7667163134 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.5833333333 7.06120827912 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232599887033 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0933849004853 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0386607327287 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142262835627 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0453858866617 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 50.2224549098 86% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 690, Rule ID: IN_WHO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whom'?
Suggestion: whom
...ar will have personal income lower than who do not take a gap-year. Restrictively,...
^^^
Line 4, column 700, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ve personal income lower than who do not take a gap-year. Restrictively, high-sch...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, hence, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, in conclusion, as a result, first of all, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1771.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 338.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23964497041 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77034475394 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568047337278 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 546.3 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 80.4818820191 49.4020404114 163% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.583333333 106.682146367 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1666666667 20.7667163134 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.5833333333 7.06120827912 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232599887033 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0933849004853 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0386607327287 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142262835627 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0453858866617 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 50.2224549098 86% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.