Some teachers think that international student exchange would be beneficial for all teenage school students.
Do you think its advantages will outweigh the disadvantages?
There are mentors who assume that international exchange programs bring a positive impact to juvenile students, while there are others arguing the disadvantages of it. However, it is acceptable that these programs give a positive experience rather than the negative one, based on the following reasons.
Regarding the advantages, teenagers can build a social cycle with their international students which is beneficial for their adulthood. Kids are the man of the future. By experiencing different cultural aspects, and having social interaction with people from different lifestyles, the youths will develop a sense of empathy, understanding, and a sense of camaraderie with their foreign counterparts. When they become adults, interaction with foreign origins will come naturally to them, which brings comfort in their workplace.
In addition, these exchange programs sure bring a sense of motivation or a sense of humanitarian to the young students. This is the most beneficial aspect as an exchange student. For instance, youngsters from developing nations look up to youths from developed countries, get inspired by them which results in better task performance and improved innovative ideas. Likewise, young people from rich countries will sympathize with their counterparts from poorer nations and try their best to bring them development, to be a source of motivation, and will sort out mechanisms to help solve the problems in the developing world. Last but not least, teenagers experiencing a lifestyle at a foreign place will improve their management skills, teamwork capacity, and likely to become more self-reliant and resilient which are valuable characteristics as an individual.
Although there is a potential to get exposure to depression or use of drugs since youngsters are inexperienced in tackling stress or choosing a reliable partnership, the advantages of going to exchange programs are more appealing to most of them.
To sum up, teenagers traveling to foreign countries as exchange students will improve their personal skills such as managing ability and will later bring positive changes to society as a whole, despite a few potentials to get exposed to the risks.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-27 | Jaydee1774 | 73 | view |
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future such as those related to science and technology Discuss both these views and 73
- The charts below compare the age structure of the populations of France and India in 1984 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compa 78
- The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after five years 78
- The graph below shows population figures for India and China since the year 2000 and predicted population growth up until 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 92
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, likewise, look, regarding, so, while, for instance, in addition, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1867.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54005934718 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08929013098 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563798219585 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 576.0 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 71.6179872286 49.4020404114 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.615384615 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9230769231 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.76923076923 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15864529562 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.061567861282 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0589078078488 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0862216829377 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0268164428198 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.