Some think that current generation should take steps to protect the environment for the next generation. Do you agree or disagree?
In resent decades environmental problems have become a sever threat to the future of our planet. Certain people believe that if society wants their successors having happy tomorrow it will constantly search any ways of nature defence. I totally agree with this statement and believe that this is direct responsibility of each generation and moreover present population should be considered as the last Earth’s hope.
Firstly, the primary humanity’s liability not to worsen present situation. No one but forebears build starting point for next generations. It is significant because of environmental deterioration evolves extremely progressively. Ecological linkages are sophisticated therefore one lose is enough to destroy a whole ecosystem. According to D.Attenboro documentary film in 2020 year there was left 35% of wildness, while in 1997 we have had 46%. People exterminated 11% nature during 23 years only. Every day we need more than yesterday. Consequently, our generation must fight for our planet every day and so must act persons, who will replace us.
Secondly, our generation probably has the last opportunity to buckle down and amend several aspects of human’s perception of relationship between people and nature. It should be done to prevent following environmental harm that will inevitably cause ruinous consequences for human race. Thus greenhouse effect, contamination, unreasonable consumption policy eventually lead to resource depletion and decline in biodiversity. Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services reports that about half of natural habitats are lost and at least a million species are under threat of extinction. It means that the greatest problem we have now is not missing of some animals, which our grandchildren will be able to see only in pictures, but irrevocable collapse of biological mechanisms. Hardly will any further exist in reality we are creating, that’s why prompt reaction more pressures than gold.
In conclusion, this essay supports the idea that, people in actual critical moment have duty to next generations to deter modern environmental situation and to develop system solutions, solutions for such issues as soon as possible.
- Nowadays many people have access to computers on a wide basis and a large number of children play computer games What are the negative impacts of playing computer games and what can be done to minimize the bad effects 67
- Some people believe that death penalty is the best method for those who committed violent crimes Other people think that this measure is not appropriate in today s world Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
- Even though doctors advise old people to get more exercise many old people do not get enough What are the reasons for this What are some possible solutions for this 89
- Modern technology is now very common in most workplaces Do you think the advantages of this outweigh disadvantages 11
- Information technology is changing many aspects of our lives and now dominates our home leisure and work activities To what extent do the benefits of information technology outweigh the disadvantages 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 343, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Attenboro
...stroy a whole ecosystem. According to D.Attenboro documentary film in 2020 year there was...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 289, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...se ruinous consequences for human race. Thus greenhouse effect, contamination, unrea...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, at least, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1888.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61904761905 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12710246734 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 176.041082164 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.696428571429 0.561755894193 124% => OK
syllable_count: 594.9 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.7498099492 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.888888889 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.55555555556 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120870571181 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.030186895675 0.084324248473 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0415115151455 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0760680785144 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0161688367483 0.056905535591 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.07 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 78.4519038076 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.