Some universities currently provide Internet-based courses as the alternatives for conventional learning models. This trend, in many cases, should be more beneficial.
Online courses would almost surely reduce financial pressure for students. This is given that money, except for tuition fee, is frequently spent on rudimentary needs, such as daily traveling, extracurricular activities, or uniform, which would not put stress on students choosing to follow the lectures through an online platform at home. As a consequence, studying online, compared to schooling, can save such pupils a significant amount of expenditure, especially for those who want to do oversea courses. For example, my sister, a Vietnamese student, desired to attend X University, which is located in America, so far from my country. To that end, she, who was from a humble background and failed to obtain scholarship grants, needed a significant amount of spending, ranging from tuition to traveling, daily expenses, and accommodation, ruining her dream. Fortunately, X University offered online learning program, so she took an opportunity to enroll an MBA about Applied Linguistics, which would have been unfeasible in those days when Internet-based education was not popular.
Although I mostly support the aforementioned point, to play the devil’s advocate, I would entertain a counter-argument. Admittedly, studying online might believably cause distractions, leading to worse academic outcome. Since students are not supervised by teachers and study in their comfort zones, they tend to be distracted by some temptations, like smartphones or games, which is considered to negatively affect their performance. Nonetheless, even in this case, I would say that online learning merely contributes to the bad situation, but does not cause it. Apart from studying online, those who lack concentration and determination are inclined to be neglected in whatever they do. In other words, people always find a way to do what they want to do. To exemplify this point of view, I, during the Covid-19 pandemic period, when people prevent the spread of such contagious disease by maintaining a social distance, had to take online courses. Initially, I had difficulty in focusing on the lecture given the freedom when studying at home, but subsequently, I removed anything distracting me, such as putting off my phone into airplane mode, in order to make myself fully concentrated on the lectures. Thanks to my discipline, I achieved an academic result as good as those when schooled.
In conclusion, for the aforementioned reasons, I believe that studying online would be a positive development.
- The diagram shows rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian town 61
- A lot of places in the world rely on tourism as a main source of income Unfortunately tourism can also be a source of problems if it is not managed correctly Describe the advantages and disadvantages of tourism in the world 89
- In many countries more and more people choose to buy imported food rather than food produced locally Why people buy imported food What could be done to encourage people to buy local food 61
- Some people hold that we should spend money and time on the protection of wild animals while others suggest that the money should be spent on populations living in the poorest areas of the world What is your opinion 61
- Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, nonetheless, so, apart from, except for, for example, in conclusion, such as, in many cases, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2257.0 1615.20841683 140% => OK
No of words: 410.0 315.596192385 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50487804878 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24016748122 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 252.0 176.041082164 143% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614634146341 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 706.5 506.74238477 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 12.0 4.76152304609 252% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.3956951632 49.4020404114 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.388888889 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7777777778 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.44444444444 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242530551891 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0653212068808 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0499585062483 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144011295338 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0152966213051 0.056905535591 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 129.0 78.4519038076 164% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.