Space exploration is much too expensive and the money should be spent on more important things Do you agree or disagree

In the last few decades many people believe that exploration to the outer space is a waste of money, and it should be used to other important sector relating to earth issues such as reducing unemployment rate and building new infrastructure. Therefore, I absolutely agree that spending money on space exploration is less important, and the authorities should allocate their budget to another sector that is much more important than the exploration.

Although space exploration is beneficial to our lives such as satellites, but it does not necessarily mean that we have to explore the space on the account of extortionate price problem. The first point that I would like to make is allocating budget of every single country to reduce the rate of unemployment. For example, these days the number of unemployment person in my country is quite high and becoming a big issue to solve soon. Creating new jobs by the government is a good choice to take. Recently, they have been constructed some automobile factories in Karawang, and many people from all over the country get there to apply job, and some are accepted by the companies. As a result, it will increase national income significantly.

In addition to this, the government also should spend their money on building infrastructure such as new roads. Establishing roads in a large-scale can bring benefits to many. An example to illustrate this point is distribution of goods. In my hometown, the local government build new roads and fix some to connect one place to another. The daily products initially were at a high cost. Consequently, after they created new paths and repaired the broken one, the price was becoming cheaper, and people could buy any product such as rice for eating and cement for building new houses.

To sum up, although exploration to the outer space is a good idea, but there are money issues on earth to be addressed such as decreasing poverty and building new road in infrastructure sector. In my opinion, creating new jobs by establishing new factory in a large-scale can solve poverty issue and new road is expected to make daily products price goes down.

Votes
Average: 9.3 (4 votes)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, so, therefore, for example, in addition, such as, as a result, in my opinion, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1787.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 360.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96388888889 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9007967722 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530555555556 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 569.7 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 0.809619238477 865% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.3931681358 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.6875 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6875 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152881129836 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0483272871466 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0818905163238 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112379836423 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109746252076 0.056905535591 193% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 21.0 9.78957915832 215% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.