Space travel has been made sometime and people think that space tourism will be probably developed in the future. Do you think space travel would be a positive and negative development?
Thanks to the emergence of state-of-the-art innovation, travelling beyond the Earth became possible and it is expected to gain the popularity in the next decades. This tendency will exert a double-edged impact, which I will discuss below.
To begin with, people in favor of space travel point out its benefit in terms of leisure and exploration. In fact, the desire of discovering new things is inherent in humans’ thoughts; thus, outer space, which is full of interesting mysteries, is deemed as a potential destination for tourists. In other words, travelling through the universe may satisfy people’s unlimited demand on leisure thanks to its exceptional attractiveness. Another advantage can be reaped in the field of science. Indeed, such journeys provide crucial data of how people’s biological features change to adapt to the loss or modification of gravity, which cannot be collected precisely in casual experiments on the Earth. As human being has been dealing with many global challenges, threatening our existence, this information plays an important role in the urgent mission of exploring a potential alternative planet.
On the other hand, the trend toward space travel also leads to several drawbacks. Indeed, it is inevitable that the adventure would release a substantial amount of space debris, making it more dangerous for spacecraft to transport. In addition, regarding to state-owned space travel projects, the exorbitant expenditure may exert a financial burden on the government. Therefore, it is can be seen that prioritizing the mission beyond the Earth over ones on the Earth, states may be constrained to fulfill requirements on resolving social issue, like welfare of public security.
In brief, while not disavowing the benefits of aerospace travel, I believe that it is a negative development because the advantages cannot outweigh the disadvantages.
- the only way to improve safety of out roads is to give much stricter punishments on driving offenses.To what extent do you agree? 84
- Some people think that governments should ban dangerous sports, while others think people should have freedom to do any sports or activity. Discuss both views and give your own opinion? 78
- The diagram below shows the water cycle, which is the continuous movement of water on, above and below the surface of the Earth.You should spend about 20 minutes on this task. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make 78
- The diagram below shows the changes of an island between 1990 and now. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- The world natural resources are consumed at an ever-increased rate.What are the causes of this situation? What are the solutions? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Thanks to the emergence of state-of-the-...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed impact, which I will discuss below. To begin with, people in favor of spac...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...loring a potential alternative planet. On the other hand, the trend toward sp...
^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sue, like welfare of public security. In brief, while not disavowing the ben...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, regarding, so, therefore, thus, while, in addition, in brief, in fact, in other words, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1616.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55326460481 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1983362664 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642611683849 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.0930495126 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.307692308 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3846153846 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3076923077 7.06120827912 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271983886632 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0854164039445 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0389835102954 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140483389147 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.050604926572 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.21 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.1 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.