Cycling is healthier and environmentally friendly form of transport. Nevertheless, cycling is getting less popular. What are the reasons of this trend? What can be done to make cycling more popular?
A decline in popularity of travelling by bicycle has been witnessed for decades. Two reasons stand out as responsible for this problem, which can be tackled by the following feasible solutions.
To begin with, the fall of cycling trend may be explained by two major contributing factors. Firstly, there has been a consensus that compared to other types of transportation, cycling is one of the most physically demanding activities, requiring users to channel an excessive load of strength into their movement. As a consequence, this deters citizens, especially ones with health problems like cardiovascular diseases, or osteoporosis, from travelling by bicycle. Secondly, its far lower speed also another weakness of cycling. Indeed, as residents are always willing to speed up their journey time, they tend to prioritize options which can provide a rapid and convenient transport services rather than bicycle.
However, many possible measures can be proposed to resolve the above situation. Specifically, events that require participants to cycling over a short distance are highly recommended. Indeed, not only do they help residents build up their strength and but also enhance public awareness of health benefits brought about by cycling. In addition, the government also needs to put its weight behind this mission by adopting policies to encourage uses of bicycle. Particularly, measures such as creating dedicated cycling lanes have been proved to reduce commuting time for cyclist, the advantages of which cannot be reaped when people utilize other means of transport. Hence, this upgraded efficiency is expected to act as a catalyst for a rise in number of cyclists.
Briefly, only by efforts of both citizens and the authority will the falling prevalence of cycling be improved.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-22 | hangduan94@gmail.com | 61 | view |
| 2019-03-06 | tien.xinh.ne | 78 | view |
| 2018-12-12 | phuong cao | 84 | view |
- This table shows the percentage of school aged boys in two different age groups who participated in 5 different sports in the UK in 2010.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Many people think studying in university is a waste of time and money. They are supposed that young people should work for real experience. Do you agree or disagree? 89
- the only way to improve safety of out roads is to give much stricter punishments on driving offenses.To what extent do you agree? 84
- The bar chart below shows the exporting rate of 4 different types of fruit in the USA, Mexico and South Africa in 2012, measured by tons.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 113, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ling prevalence of cycling be improved.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, briefly, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, in addition, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1522.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47482014388 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96375810736 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.665467625899 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.9311262623 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.714285714 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8571428571 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.42857142857 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194452284115 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.06081152362 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0435186906553 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117173083806 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00236118259996 0.056905535591 4% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.97 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.