spoken communication is more powerful than written communication Do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

spoken communication is more powerful than written communication
Do you agree or disagree?

In recent decades, the strengths of communication types have been hotly discussed. While some people think that the spoken language outweighs the written one, it is undeniable that both communicating methods have their dominant roles in certain situations.

On the one hand, verbal communication is superior to writing for some reasons. Firstly, due to being time-saving and effective in transferring information, oral communication is facilitated in almost all social activities. For example, in meetings, talking directly to partners will help speakers have urgent feedbacks without consuming time reading emails. In addition, spoken communication is more highly persuasive than the written one. By using spoken words illustrated by gestures and emotions, orators can not only express their very opinion but also easily get trust and support from the audience.

On the other hand, written communication is more powerful in many situations. At first, written language plays a big part in exchanging and keeping long-winded information. Since it is difficult to remember all details just by speaking, it is advisable to jot down all of them on paper for necessary future references. Moreover, essential documents are often kept in the form of written texts. For instance, the legal contract created by the consent between the two or more parties is often made up of written texts, which is positive proof for the long-term cooperation among people.

By way of conclusion, both kinds of communication have their own power in different cases. Oral communication is useful for direct and social conversations while the written form is preferable for study and law. For those reasons, people should choose the most appropriate way to show their opinion in certain circumstances.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-12-17 Kha Linh 61 view
2024-12-17 Kha Linh 61 view
2024-12-14 Sang Sang Sang 73 view
2024-12-13 Sang Sang Sang 78 view
2024-12-08 ankushgurumaa 78 view
Essays by user JennyLee :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... dominant roles in certain situations. On the one hand, verbal communication is...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, while, for example, for instance, in addition, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1509.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48727272727 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02707561466 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629090909091 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.5994089788 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.6 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.26666666667 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282308661853 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108314919729 0.084324248473 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112120542254 0.0667982634062 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171837634058 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0271838469628 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.