Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes for example working for charity, improving the neighborhood or teaching sports to younger children. To what extent do you agree or disagree.
People argue about the must-do free social service by high school students, such as joining with charity, taking part in social work and teaching young children as it is a part of the school curriculum. Some people say it is a must, while some others say; this should be only voluntary. I agree with the later statement.
Making charitable activities compulsory subject causes more harm than benefit to the school children. Because many of them are already compromised and overstressed with their academic work. In addition to these, adding social service which needs more time and energy indefinitely overburden student's life. Nowadays pupil hardly finds time to even engage in sports other recreational activities which are helpful to relax their mind and body. Therefore, many of them are depressed. A recent survey in the US pointed out that lack of free time and academic stress is the leading cause of depression in high school youth.
On the other hand, social activity should be a voluntary one; whoever wishes, and has enough time and energy should be allowed to do so. Social activities give happiness and satisfaction to the mind only when they are done with heart . Forced to do activities ruin the purpose of this kind of exercise and take away the task satisfaction. If students are asked to do compulsory charitable endeavour they will do it without any involvement, just for the sake of doing it. This will make them unhappy and ultimately turn them to develop negative thoughts about social service. For example, we can recall our memories when we were asked to do "siramadana" at school how much we have hated it.
In conclusion, the charitable task should be done only voluntarily then the only pupil can understand the principles of this work and enjoy, otherwise the purpose is lost and it causes more harm than benefit to high school children.
- The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 150 words 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Television has destroyed communication among friends and family Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 61
- spoken communication is more powerful than written communication 78
- spoken communication is more powerful than written communication Do you agree or disagree 78
- Cohabitation is believed to bring huge advantages for young people since it enables them to fully understand each other before deciding to get married Do you agree or disagree with this opinion 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 271, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t, while some others say; this should be only voluntary. I agree with the later ...
^^
Line 3, column 29, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...atement. Making charitable activities compulsory subject causes more harm than...
^^
Line 5, column 234, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... mind only when they are done with heart . Forced to do activities ruin the purpos...
^^
Line 5, column 461, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ut any involvement, just for the sake of doing it. This will make them unhappy an...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, then, therefore, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1570.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75455325199 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557324840764 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.7961320188 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.125 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.625 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229654745692 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0654849655142 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0590464493094 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142259137699 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0657782850459 0.056905535591 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.