Spoken communication is more powerful than written communication. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Many people may believe that speaking is a more powerful form of communication than writing. Personally, I think both methods are highly effective modes of communication.
On the one hand, speaking is an extremely effective and efficient mode of communication in certain contexts. Firstly, oral communication enables people to connect with their listeners on an emotional level. For example, the tone of singers’ voices are able to inspire and influence others simply through their songs. Secondly, misunderstanding can also easily be prevented when people interact face to face. This means that when one person is confused about what the other is saying, he can immediately ask for further explanation to ensure that the information being exchanged is completely understood.
On the other hand, writing can also be an effective tool in everyday communication. The first reason is that in the workplace, speech may sometimes be ignored or interpreted in different ways. Therefore, written messages, emails, and documents are effective tools which help employees reread documents repeatedly to avoid miscommunication. The second reason is that written documents are usually required by legal matters, including job descriptions and emails are kept by written form.
In conclusion, both speaking and writing communication have their own purposes, benefits and drawbacks. I suppose that people should choose the method which is the most appropriate in the specific condition.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 78 | view |
| 2024-10-21 | aceg1000 | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-19 | vidung | 90 | view |
| 2024-10-19 | Tuan Harry | 11 | view |
| 2024-10-19 | Tuan Harry | 11 | view |
- Spoken communication is more powerful than written communication To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Spoken communication is more powerful than written communication To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Some people believe that reading stories from a book is better than watching TV or playing computer games for children To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, i suppose, i think, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 41.998997996 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1263.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 223.0 315.596192385 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.66367713004 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 4.20363070211 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15765126755 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.632286995516 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 391.5 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.0957673255 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.1538461538 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1538461538 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.92307692308 7.06120827912 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14205890372 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0487011135959 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0673949937005 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0915436455161 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0522475477111 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.25 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.