Spoken communication is more powerful than written communication. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The communication by speaking or writing is thought-provocative. Several people cling to that communication by speaking is a better way to communicate than communication by writing. I partly agree with this argument due to these reasons.
On the one hand, I agree that spoken communication is more powerful than others. Firstly, in some situations requiring body language, facial expressions, and emotions, spoken communication has some advantages. Speaking face-to-face encourages people to become closer due to the emotions that people demonstrate to others, which leads to other people can express their feelings. For instance, when people watch a comedy, they usually laugh a lot and show their emotions about the comedy. Secondly, spoken communication is usually faster than written communication. Speaking to each other help us to display our ideas more efficiently
because our idea shown by our mouth is faster than by pen or pencil when writing. For example, when we speak face-to-face, people always understand our idea and do it faster. As a result, people can understand each other better and faster.
On the other hand, written communication also has some benefits in some cases. Firstly, in business, people need to discuss some problems with partners, a document text could provide us enough information and prevent some bad cases when we forget the memorizes about the problems. For example, when people are talking to the crowd, some people are usually confused and forget what they have prepared, when these people have the document text, they could be confident to talk to the crowd. Secondly, for the muted individuals, written communication is the only way they could utilize it to show their ideas. So, written communication is also needed.
In conclusion, both written and spoken have their own advantages and all of them are also needed. I believe that written or spoken communication depends on the situation.
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- Nowadays the environment is being threatened significantly What are the causes and consequences of this problem Give solutions for this problem 80
- Spoken communication is more powerful than written communication To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...th this argument due to these reasons. On the one hand, I agree that spoken com...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...derstand each other better and faster. On the other hand, written communication...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... written communication is also needed. In conclusion, both written and spoken h...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, in some cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1634.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32247557003 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03035602614 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.491856677524 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.0378098508 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.7777777778 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0555555556 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.27777777778 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285066610911 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125558263378 0.084324248473 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126036422783 0.0667982634062 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17646975748 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0869010471394 0.056905535591 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.28 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.