Sport is becoming a business. More and more companies are getting involved in sport events. Do you think that it is a positive or negative development?
In recent years, sport has played an important part in business development and there are many companies contributing to sporting events. From my perspective, this support also has pros and cons because sport events could help people have more confidence and equal job opportunities, while this is also negative for financial and society. This essay will explore arguments against companies involved in sports, before presenting my opinion.
Admittedly, there are some arguments in favour of many companies supporting sport events for funding and business. First, sports businesses are believed to equalize job opportunities among young adolescents regardless of their family background. This financial support, presumably tends not only to increase the overall sportsperson of lower-income people but also to mitigate their feeling of inferiority. In addition, companies involved in sport events will tempt many people who have ambition and also advertise their product, especially promoting tradition or culture in that country by sports. Second, many owners choosing sports for business would result in a higher supply of highly qualified workers, they can train many coaches or grow more young talents in the near future, which benefits society in the long run. For example, the Loving Sport company in VietNam is being developed and also spreading positive vibes to all people should get their goals in sports, which promotes an egalitarian society. In fact, it is acknowledged that skilled and knowledgeable human capital is imperative to foster economic growth and technological development in any nation.
Nevertheless, the resultant problems would be far more significant than the minor benefits once all companies focus too much on sport events. First, offering all companies involved in sport would likely correspond with tremendous financial strain on a country. Generating no income from other activities and products more suitable for other people, companies could become over-reliant on the state budget for funding, meaning that there would be less input to develop other important areas such as healthcare systems and transport infrastructure. Second, business in sport would tempt many young people including those who are not sporting inclined or show no interest in sport events and adding great burdens for government and companies and potentially wasting time that these young people could spend their time on suitable paths. It, instead, would be a more business viable option if the resources were focused on supporting less privileged yet gifted people to go to their achievement.
In conclusion, despite the long-term nature of the sport. However, it’s would be more negative effects if companies relied on that too much. From my point of view, the government and all people should consider the way to grow an economy that could develop all areas and business in sport have been a trend in these days need to solve.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-06-21 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
- The diagram below shows how a modern landfill for household waste is designed Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- Table The price of a cup of coffee in six cities from 2010 to 2014 in Australia 61
- Many people argue that in order to improve educational quality high school students should be encouraged to make comments or even criticism of their teachers Others think it will lead to loss of respect and discipline in the classroom Discuss both views a 73
- The table below show results of a survey of urban residents opinion related to various aspects of life in 1980 and 2010 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- In some countries young people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing high school and starting university studies Discuss the advantages and disadvantages for young people who decide do this 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2490.0 1615.20841683 154% => OK
No of words: 457.0 315.596192385 145% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44857768053 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62358717085 4.20363070211 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77466883826 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 249.0 176.041082164 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544857768053 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 762.3 506.74238477 150% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.3150422448 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.333333333 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3888888889 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.72222222222 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.363732831247 0.244688304435 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120550667392 0.084324248473 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0550734807865 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.245113109772 0.151304729494 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0216929461702 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 131.0 78.4519038076 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2490.0 1615.20841683 154% => OK
No of words: 457.0 315.596192385 145% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44857768053 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62358717085 4.20363070211 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77466883826 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 249.0 176.041082164 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544857768053 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 762.3 506.74238477 150% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.3150422448 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.333333333 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3888888889 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.72222222222 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.363732831247 0.244688304435 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120550667392 0.084324248473 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0550734807865 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.245113109772 0.151304729494 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0216929461702 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 131.0 78.4519038076 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.