Still starvation despite of advances
Although there are the advances conducted in algriculture, many people all over the world still face with the starvation. This essay will discuss several reasons leading to this issue and the measure can be taken to deal with this problem.
Thanks to the incredible breakthrough in technology, some scientists create the innovations applied in algriculture to boost its productivity. However, these advances are just used in some particular nations which makes other poor countries lack of the information of them and the residents in these nations continue to suffer the low efficiency in crop. Moreover, in order to take advantages of the algricultural advances, the farmers need to obtain enough finanicial resources to afford them due to the relatively high price. If the farmers are poor, they cannot improve their algricultural life by these advances.
In my view, anything has its own solutions and this problem is not an exception. The developed countries can encourage by providing more supports about the exchange programs for students or scientists from the poor ones. They will have a golden opportunity to broaden their knowledge about these agricultural innovations and convey them to the farmers to push up their horizon. Moreover, the rich countries or the international organizations should supply more money to people working in algriculture in order to reduce the financial burden. Therefore, they can find it easier to approach the advances and decrease the rate of starvation.
In conclusion, many people are still hungry despite of the breakthroughs related to algriculture which is resulted from some reasons and many methods can be done to tackle this problem.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-27 | tieptaycuong | 56 | view |
| 2018-08-30 | Phan Thị Minh Thiện | 61 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, in conclusion, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1428.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36842105263 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98378795478 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.578947368421 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.7316264684 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.0 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1666666667 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.83333333333 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.102436102264 0.244688304435 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0357624824169 0.084324248473 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0563579171869 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0689977029403 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0407751016123 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.