It is frequently argued that pupils study far more with their teachers than other sources such as the internet or television. To some extent, I suppose that children can learn a lot from the internet and television, but I am also in favor of educators being still relevant in the modern age . In this essay, I will demonstrate my point of view.
To begin with, it is plain that studying with schoolteachers yields several benefits. Lecturers are predecessors with in-depth intelligence; for this reason, they know how to comprehend properly and have a logical study regimen. For example, numerous idle graduates excitedly declare that they were thankful to their assistance since they constantly reminded them to complete their homework and meticulously encouraged them, which made them more driven and better. Not only do they have academic insight, but they also understand distinctive students' needs and gifts in order to provide the most effective methods of educating them. Apprentices, who solely educate themselves through online training, may have difficulty processing what they heard and saw since there is too much material to categorize and pick. Without teachers, they will be unable to determine when and how to begin. In other words, mistresses constantly manage to deliver learners exciting and substantial lessons, ensuring that trainers learn from precise and beneficial know-how. Furthermore, instructors may assist undergraduates in cultivating momentous soft skills in addition to studying. Juniors may connect with their tutors and classmates while attending face-to-face sessions, which gives them the opportunity to improve their interpersonal communication skills. To illustrate, if they have any queries or answers, they would boldly ask instructors and argue with peers to convey their views. Similarly, assistants teach learners how to be decent citizens. Apprentices are taught moral precepts in order for them to treat people well. Mentors also teach students about living an optimistic life and overcoming hardship. Accordingly, scholars may step-by-step evolve to join life, which “virtual professors” such as the internet can educate them.
On the other hand, it is not frequently radical to have supervisors' guides; juniors can study themselves using alternative resources such as the internet or privileged webs. The reason for this is that there are a huge number of documents on the Internet that are donated in various ways by individuals all over the globe, including element scientists, specialists, and those who have an in-depth knowledge. This can be a quite trustworthy authority to get them to figure out. The more enthusiastic the seniors are about it, the more they want to trace. It is also a means for them to improve themselves in becoming self-sufficient. . Directly absorbed expertise is more readily digested than monotonous sermons in classes; also, teaching complete comprehension in class takes a long time since academics can only supply them with basic information, which is insufficient for them to know inside. Thereby, learning from professors is likely to make scholars more sedentary. Teenagers take in information dimly because they merely look forward to their supervisors, anytime they grant any origin, they take it in faintly. It is tough for them to manage intricate and predictable difficulties.
In conclusion, there is no doubt that technology may be educational; yet, the job of supervisors is not substituted. Only until it is passed down by tutors does the ocean of philosophy become truly accessible to students.
- Students today can easily access information online so libraries are no longer necessary Do you agree or disagree 78
- The diagram shows the life cycle of the honey bee 78
- The flowchart below shows the process involved in writing formal academic essay for particular university course Describe the stages of the process in a reporter a university lecturer You should write at least 150 words Syerapke 78
- Students today can easily access information online so libraries are no longer necessary Do you agree or disagree 85
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future such as those related to science and technology Discuss both these views a 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 292, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...s being still relevant in the modern age . In this essay, I will demonstrate my po...
^^
Line 5, column 634, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...themselves in becoming self-sufficient. . Directly absorbed expertise is more rea...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, furthermore, if, look, may, similarly, so, still, thus, well, while, for example, i suppose, in addition, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, in other words, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 60.0 24.0651302605 249% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 77.0 41.998997996 183% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3043.0 1615.20841683 188% => OK
No of words: 557.0 315.596192385 176% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4631956912 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.85807034144 4.20363070211 116% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02061045892 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 324.0 176.041082164 184% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581687612208 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 945.0 506.74238477 186% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 16.0721442886 174% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.8849035875 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.678571429 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8928571429 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.57142857143 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 8.67935871743 196% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188919123432 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0472143317944 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0715337606669 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124647304189 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0993518494835 0.056905535591 175% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 179.0 78.4519038076 228% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.