Students in school or university learn more from classes of teachers than other resources (eg: TV, Internet), do you agree or disagree?
In modern days, due to the development of advanced technology and the Internet, students can approach knowledge in various ways besides learning from school. However, a school of thought holds that learning in classes of teachers is more ubiquitous for students than getting knowledge from other resources such as TV or the Internet. From my perspective, this point of view is well-grounded and this paper will provide justifications for my opinion.
It is no doubt that children learn more from their teachers than any other learning platforms on the Internet. Thanks to the majority of time that they spend in school, do youngsters not have enough time for self-studying which means that they cannot expose to any extra-knowledge provided in books, on TV or the Internet. For example, in Vietnam, there is a tendency of students being forced to attend extra classes in the evening after a long school-time, consequently, the last part of the day will be utilized to cope with the enormous volume of homework that teachers gave them and there is no time for Internet-searching. Therefore, the less time they have, the less they can learn from other resources apart from their teachers at school.
Nonetheless, the role of teachers cannot be replaced by the Internet or TV. It is irrefutable that online learning is an effective instrument helping students to broaden their horizons. Despite its advantages, the conventional method of learning is still more preferable as teachers can give explanations directly to assist their students in understanding their lectures as well as providing individual students with an appropriate measurement. Thus, face-off learning not only enhances the interaction between teachers and students but also improves the comprehension of them in those subjects.
All in all, although technology facilitates us with another superior way of learning, the traditional learning method is still irreplaceable. Nevertheless, students still ought to make use of the variety of learning approaches in order to escalate the knowledge of themselves
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-09 | Phạm Minh Trang | 77 | view |
- It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening Do you agree or disagree 78
- THE PIE CHART BELOW SHOW THE AMOUNT OF ELECTRICITY GENERATED BY ENERGY SOURCE IN SCOTLAND FOR 20 YEARS AGO AND LAST YEAR 82
- Some people think everyone should be a vegetarian because we do not have to eat meat to have a healthy diet Do you agree or disagree 73
- Advertising may discourage people from being different individuals by making us all want to do the same and look the same To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Students in school or university learn more from classes of teachers than other resources eg TV Internet do you agree or disagree 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, however, if, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, still, therefore, thus, well, apart from, for example, no doubt, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1750.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36809815951 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14940907516 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542944785276 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.3371250521 49.4020404114 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.615384615 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0769230769 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.4615384615 7.06120827912 176% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.383871807332 0.244688304435 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14822582132 0.084324248473 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118343013718 0.0667982634062 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.222816872221 0.151304729494 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105620414222 0.056905535591 186% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.