Studying with a group of students in a classroom is more beneficial than learning online at home.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people believe that learning through group discussion in a classroom is more important that obtaining knowledge by oneself on internet at home is convincing, and I agree with that statement. My inclination will be discussed in the ensuing paragraphs.
To begin with, out of all the reasons of positive effects of studying in a group in the classroom, the strongest one to clear my view is a group discussion might emerge a number of opinions. This is because, in a group there are many students, and each of them have their own idea to solve a problem. For example, during the university days I always discussed with my classmates to solve any confusion regarding a topic. I found this way highly effective. Furthermore, studyin in a group might be helpful to enrich our knowledge. This means that, along with solving a problem we might have many views from others which definitely strengthen our knowledge. Hence, it is highly significant of studying with other students.
On the other hand, some people counter claims the mentioned support. The foremost argument they do is learning online one can focus his or her concentration more on a particular topic. To add to this, they think at home one can find a serene environment for studying. Moreover, there are huge resources online, so there is no need to waste time by enganging in a group.
To conclude it can be said that, despite of having some benefits of studying online my arguments such easy way of solving a problem as well as broading knowledge by learning with a group might be logically acceptable.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-17 | nhub2409785 | 56 | view |
| 2023-12-30 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-09-08 | hinhin411 | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-16 | hunghoang | 61 | view |
| 2023-07-07 | quoctoan@ | 78 | view |
- The charts show world pineapple exports by the top three pineapple producing countries in 2009 and 2019 and a breakdown of the cost to the consumer of each pineapple in 2019 73
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The graph shows Underground Station passenger numbers in London Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 150 words 73
- The chart shows the results of surveys in one African country asking teenagers the main reasons for using their phones between 2016 and 2019 78
- Some people believe that children should be banned from using their phones during the school day Others believe that children should be allowed to use their phones Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 137, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...m, the strongest one to clear my view is a group discussion might emerge a number...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, then, well, for example, as well as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1303.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.843866171 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80736839125 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576208178439 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 407.7 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.4841193291 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.0714285714 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2142857143 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.42857142857 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233539226888 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0727968280082 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0730732765356 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14731718441 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0398716372617 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.