Studying with a group of students in a classroom is more beneficial than learning online at home.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
In modern society, there are many ways to study. There is a belief that studying with a group of students in a classroom is more beneficial than learning online at home. It is clear that learning with others has more benefits.
The first aspect to point out is that students can learn how to communicate with people if they study in a classroom. For example, there is a curriculum that they need to work within a group. In this case, they need to negotiate with other classmates and they need to accept different opinions rather than insisting on their thoughts in order to achieve their goals as a party. This skill is vital when they become adults. Therefore, lessons in a classroom have more positive points for the young.
Another important issue is that it would be helpful for individuals who have disabilities when it comes to studying. For instance, if one had an issue with hearing, online classes would be difficult for them to complete their course. When this person was surrounded by other classmates, they would be able to be helped as lessons go through. This way of interacting is beneficial not only for people who have disadvantages but other classmates will also have benefits by helping others. This experience will be important for them in the future in terms of understanding the importance of assisting disadvantaged people in society.
To conclude, studying with a member of students in a classroom has more positive points for the young in terms of interacting with others effectively. If they learn how to help each other at school, this skill will have a great influence on their behaviour in the future which is necessary for our society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-17 | nhub2409785 | 56 | view |
| 2023-12-30 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-09-08 | hinhin411 | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-16 | hunghoang | 61 | view |
| 2023-07-07 | quoctoan@ | 78 | view |
- Task 1 The diagrams show a museum and its surroundings in 1990 and 2010 73
- Environmental damage is a problem in most countries What are the major causes of environmental damage Who is responsible for preventing environmental damage 84
- The diagram shows the flooding area of two rivers and possible solutions 78
- Task 2 There are several factors that motivate people to stay in the workforce and money is the most important factor To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Task 2 The population of many cities is growing rapidly What are the effects on people living in these cities What can be done to maintain the quality of life of people 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, therefore, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1389.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85664335664 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72336325496 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.503496503497 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 425.7 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2356911209 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.6 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0666666667 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.13333333333 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198059232058 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0874585385439 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104624869885 0.0667982634062 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164620415551 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0966829841623 0.056905535591 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.