It is said that learning with a group in classes brings more merits to students than studying via the Internet at home. From my perspective, I partly agree with this statement.
On one hand, studying offline at school can be seen as beneficial for several reasons. Firstly, this will help learners to boost their critical thinking through interactions and discusions with their teachers and friends. Secondly, learning in classes is a rewarding way for students to improve their level of concentration, with less technical devices being used. Therefore, scholars can alleviate their dependence of cutting- edge and have to tackle the tough questions themselves. A telling example is the Covid-19 epidemic has brought human beings loads of difficulties, especially studying. Students have to learn online and the academic performance of them did not come to their expectation.
On the other hand, learning by online assisting tools is somehow more convenient for students on account of some ideas. One of the main advantages is time and money saving. On studying via Zoom, Google Meet or Microsoft Team, scholars will have more opportunities to find extra tutorials that are adequate to what they are learning. Another example is that pupils can reduce the time they prepare for school on a daily basis, hence saving their time. This can be regarded as advantageous to students who do not live in the proximaty of their school and are not afford to pay tax for public transportation.
In conclusion, in spite of the positive impacts that learning in classes brings, I hold the opinion that this also has some drawbacks that can be improved by learning online.
- In some countries more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in What are the reasons for this How can people research this 78
- The table and charts below give information on the police budget for 2017 and 2018 in one area of Britain The table shows where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed 73
- The diagram below shows the development of cutting tools in the Stone Age Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 78
- Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governments rather than private companies Do you agree or disagree 89
- The maps below show an industrial area in the town of Norbiton and planned future development of the site Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
It is said that learning with a group in...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., I partly agree with this statement. On one hand, studying offline at school ...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...em did not come to their expectation. On the other hand, learning by online as...
^^^
Line 3, column 565, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'afforded'.
Suggestion: afforded
...e proximaty of their school and are not afford to pay tax for public transportation. ...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to pay tax for public transportation. In conclusion, in spite of the positive ...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...at can be improved by learning online.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, in conclusion, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1394.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.125 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79697995806 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.591911764706 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 418.5 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.3333003104 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.5714285714 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4285714286 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92857142857 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192148722766 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0691056967537 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0596517584031 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127869994786 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0751481401465 0.056905535591 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.