Studying with a group of students in a classroom is more beneficial than learning online at home.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
The benefits of physical learning have been well-documented. Evidence suggests that group study has a positive effect on student performance, while virtual classes lack the same level of social interaction. I agree with this sentiment and believe that it is more advantageous to attend school in person and do group work than to solely rely on online classes. I will discuss why this is the case in the following paragraphs.
Group study has been found to be a more effective learning approach than distance learning. This is due to multiple factors, one of the most important being that it helps create an environment similar to a traditional classroom. During group meetings, members are able to interact with each other and fully focus on topics without any distractions. Furthermore, the social aspect allows them to enjoy their time together while allowing breaks in studies for refreshing their minds.
Virtual learning does have its disadvantages. Reliable internet connection and uninterrupted electricity are essential components of successful distance learning, which might not always be available. Additionally, students may find it difficult to actively participate without the presence of a real instructor, and not every student is familiar with virtual meeting tools. Furthermore, there can be issues with focus and distractions due to technological interruptions. All in all, Virtual Learning does not provide the same level of connection that an in-person classroom environment provides.
In conclusion, there are abundant reasons why classroom teaching is more effective than online platforms. The advantages of traditional study methods will prevail over the technology-driven remote learning option until the drawbacks of its virtual nature are resolved.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-17 | nhub2409785 | 56 | view |
| 2023-12-30 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-09-08 | hinhin411 | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-16 | hunghoang | 61 | view |
| 2023-07-07 | quoctoan@ | 78 | view |
- Take a look at the graphics and complete the task The table and chart show data about reading among people under 30 years old Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should spend about 67
- The charts below give information about levels of education in Glasgow a city in Scottland in 2010 11
- Write about the following topic Computers are often argued to be the most important invention of the last hundred years To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your ow 84
- The diagram shows a method of shaping glass containers Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should spend about 20 minutes on this task 78
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 35, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to have'
Suggestion: to have
The benefits of physical learning have been well-documented. Evidence suggests...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, may, so, well, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1516.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.65671641791 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15379526816 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.611940298507 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.954124355 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.066666667 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8666666667 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.46666666667 7.06120827912 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180210004833 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0573180914987 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0478432550018 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111546883444 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0275321388 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.25 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.