Studying with a group of students in a classroom is more beneficial than learning online at home To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience

Some people believe that studying face-to-face with groups in classrooms or courses is much more beneficial and convenient for students than telecommunicating. From my perspective, I completely agree with this statement.
There are numerous reasons why some teenagers decide to learn online instead of interacting with groups in classrooms. Firstly, it is more convenient and effective for students, who have introverted personalities, want to isolate themselves from society, and are pretty shy. Through many virtual classrooms and meetings, they can easily express their feelings, thoughts, which helps them to be more comfortable when they study. Secondly, online learning is a great method for those who can not catch up with the broad knowledge taught in schools and universities. For example, you can apply for some learning websites such as Tienganh123 or EngBreaking to study English, which can help them to learn at their own pace and acquire knowledge at their own speed.
On the other hand, it is believed that studying and discovering with groups at schools benefit pupils to study more effectively for the following reasons. To begin with, when working in a group and interacting with friends and teachers, students can have a better acquisition of knowledge. For instance, if you communicate and debate with your friends, you only have to show and express your own ideas and opinions but also can absorb precious and useful information from your friends. As a consequence, you can build up your self-confidence and acquire knowledge more naturally and effectively. Furthermore, retrieving from discussing and debating with groups, students can develop their interpersonal and teamwork skills, which can create for them more opportunities when applying for many prestigious companies and universities. Therefore, these skills can help them to have their bosses' trust and be more prosperous.
In conclusion, I believe that studying and interacting with groups is more beneficial and convenient for students than learning online when studying in a classroom.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, to begin with, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 10.4138276553 230% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1756.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50470219436 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09292729167 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532915360502 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 515.7 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.563758107 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.428571429 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7857142857 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4285714286 7.06120827912 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.359730364499 0.244688304435 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137442698789 0.084324248473 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.076477113998 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.260172103766 0.151304729494 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0407733743363 0.056905535591 72% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.