success is often measured by wealth and material belongings. Do you think wealth is the best measure of success? What makes a successful person?
Nowadays, many people believed that richness and material belongings are considered the best success for people in their life. From my perspective, the key to being successful is the other side, and it is not necessary to be a wealth for achievement. I oppose the view and my reasons will be explained in the following paragraphs.
Many support the view that a big amount of money and material belongings would be the importance for fortunate. The general public is believed that whereas it has money there might be luckiness. What's more ordinary people usually think if someones are wealthy, being successful is not a dream for them. For example, Jhon Brick, a scientist from Brazil thanked his family for donating the budget for his invent. To sum up, it can be seen, richness is taken someplace in the person's life.
On the other hand, there would be many other options in living. Like the previous point, education and self-confidence are the essential parts of success. Everyone can be successful while he or she is taught greatly, so knowledgeable person has more confidence whilst doing something. For instance, statistics show that 60 % of the population in Indonesia is reckoned to be fortunate for having a piece of good knowledge. To repeat in short, be professional at the job and to be very knowledgable in that side, might be considered a success.
In conclusion, there might be other factors, which is a measured success, but I strongly feel that those listed above are the most common ones.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-13 | PHAM ANH THU | 89 | view |
- The chart below shows the number of men and women in further education in Britain in three periods and whether they were studying full time or part time Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where rel 67
- The line graph below gives information on cinema attendance in the UK
- Overpopulation of urban areas has led to numerous problems 11
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 78
- the graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 117, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ld be the importance for fortunate. The general public is believed that whereas it has money t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 197, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...it has money there might be luckiness. Whats more ordinary people usually think if s...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 475, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...een, richness is taken someplace in the persons life. On the other hand, there would b...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, whereas, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in short, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 13.1623246493 198% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1254.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91764705882 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84082954434 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.572549019608 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 389.7 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.9812852203 49.4020404114 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.5714285714 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2142857143 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.78571428571 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202788620372 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0742776851152 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.067304731256 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136107329139 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0347293580405 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 117, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ld be the importance for fortunate. The general public is believed that whereas it has money t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 197, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...it has money there might be luckiness. Whats more ordinary people usually think if s...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 475, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...een, richness is taken someplace in the persons life. On the other hand, there would b...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, whereas, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in short, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 13.1623246493 198% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1254.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91764705882 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84082954434 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.572549019608 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 389.7 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.9812852203 49.4020404114 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.5714285714 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2142857143 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.78571428571 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202788620372 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0742776851152 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.067304731256 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136107329139 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0347293580405 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.