Making lots of money by athletes, seems fair to some people, on the contrary others believe that earning less by professionals, working in crucial posts; is not equitable. Personally, I am in favour of the latter one.
Some people find it acceptable that prosperous sport players have high salaries. For this opinion several reasons has been said. Firstly, in order to become successful, they need to innitiate training since earlier childhood. For example, practicing from ages four to six is completely normal for gymnasts. Furthermore, because of potentially high-risk sports world, people might hurt themselves critically. For instance, if a soccer player breaks his leg, he will not be able to play any more. As a result, his professional life will be ended. Moreover, it should be considered that the number of famous and big-earner athletes is extremely lower than common sport players.
Nevertheles, another group complains that professionals whose workscope is much more important, do not being paid as well as they deserved. Tak an army general for example, having lots of responsibilities, causes severe stress and pressure on him, which never compensated for money. In addition, I believed that high-educated persons in spite of spending long time to study, do not get enough pay. As an example, a university professor who has studied and investigated for years, generally is underpaid.
In conclusion, although successful athletes should be rewarded for their accomplishments, I believe other essential professions should be remunerated fairly.
- Many people today are worried about cybercrime such as hacking and identity theft What problems does cybercrime cause and what solutions can you suggest for ordinary people and businesses to take 56
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 89
- Many people today are worried about young children using video games What problems might these games cause for children and society as a whole How could these problems be reduced 84
- Successful sports professionals can earn a great deal more money than people in other important professions Some people think this is fully justified while think it is unfair Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 84
- Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions 56
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, so, well, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, in spite of, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 41.998997996 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1319.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 242.0 315.596192385 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45041322314 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11962672395 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.723140495868 0.561755894193 129% => OK
syllable_count: 398.7 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.277350425 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.9333333333 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1333333333 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7333333333 7.06120827912 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125280404887 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0391336300422 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0372545010069 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0700298655592 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0304737069287 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.03 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, so, well, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, in spite of, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 41.998997996 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1319.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 242.0 315.596192385 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45041322314 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11962672395 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.723140495868 0.561755894193 129% => OK
syllable_count: 398.7 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.277350425 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.9333333333 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1333333333 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7333333333 7.06120827912 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125280404887 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0391336300422 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0372545010069 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0700298655592 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0304737069287 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.03 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.