the table gives information about consumer spending in 5 countries in 2002
The table gives information on consummer spending on different items in five different countries, namely, the Ireland, the Italy, the Spain, the Sweden, the Turkey in 2002. Different countries gave different consumption firgures.
As you see on the table, food/drinks and tobacco were the highest percentage of five countries. They played an important in five countries. In that, the Turkey which occupied the highest percentage: 32.14%. By contrast, the Sweden which held the lowest percentage : 15.77%. A differeance between the Turkey and the Sweden was 16.37%. In general, Ireland and Turkey that were near 30%, while the other countries which under 20%.
The second consumer spending was clothing and footwear. They also played an important in five countries. Generally, Italy they got 9%, while the other nationalconsumer standed aproximately 6%. In addition, the lowest consumer spending was Sweden with: 5.40%.
The final cosumer spending was leisure and education. In turkey, they were 4.35%. And in Spain, they got 1.98%.
In conclusion, it were food,drinks and tobacco which were the most important consumer spending in five countries. And the different countries’ consumer spending were quite different.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-16 | Trần Ánh Vy | 10 | view |
| 2023-11-03 | Roy An | view | |
| 2023-07-29 | Yen Minh | view | |
| 2023-03-06 | sarvin | view | |
| 2023-02-09 | Trần Ánh Vy | 56 | view |
- teach children 56
- the pie chart 41
- the table gives information about consumer spending in 5 countries in 2002 56
- the free pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 1991 and 2001
- Some people think that universities should provide graduates with the knowledge and skills needed in the workplace Others think that the true function of a university should be to give access to knowledge for its own sake regardless of whether the course 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s gave different consumption firgures. As you see on the table, food/drinks and...
^^
Line 5, column 29, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , drinks
...got 1.98%. In conclusion, it were food,drinks and tobacco which were the most importa...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, second, so, while, in addition, in conclusion, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 41.998997996 48% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1038.0 1615.20841683 64% => OK
No of words: 185.0 315.596192385 59% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.61081081081 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 4.20363070211 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8458284802 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 176.041082164 54% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513513513514 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 289.8 506.74238477 57% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 12.0 2.52805611222 475% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 10.0 20.2975951904 49% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.7151717001 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 61.0588235294 106.682146367 57% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 10.8823529412 20.7667163134 52% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 3.94117647059 7.06120827912 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 3.4128256513 352% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211936910177 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0668163430396 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0882677710215 0.0667982634062 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12688868678 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0836069979637 0.056905535591 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.33 50.2224549098 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.3001002004 64% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.07 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 78.4519038076 57% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.0 10.1190380762 59% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.